Title
People vs. Mateo
Case
G.R. No. L-65165
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1984
A tricycle driver was murdered by five suspects, including minors, following a drunken altercation. Confessions, eyewitness testimony, and corroborative evidence led to convictions, with penalties adjusted for Dajugar’s minority.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-65165)

Events Leading to the Crime

Manuel Pascual was approached by the five accused who lured him into drinking gin. Following a drunken spree, an altercation ensued where Pascual was violently attacked, eventually resulting in his death from multiple stab wounds. Key evidence included eyewitness testimony and extrajudicial confessions from the accused detailing their coordinated assault on Pascual.

Charges and Initial Proceedings

On November 12, 1981, the five were charged with murder marked by aggravating circumstances: treachery, evident premeditation, abuse of superior strength, and drunkenness. During the trial, three of the accused issued confessions and later altered their pleas. Ambrocio and Aglugob accepted guilt, while Martinez retracted his admission of guilt.

Trial Court's Decision

On July 29, 1983, the trial court convicted Mateo and Dajugar of murder, sentencing them to reclusion perpetua (life imprisonment) and ordering them to compensate the victim's heirs. Only Dajugar appealed the verdict, arguing his confession was improperly admitted based on alleged maltreatment and inadequate legal representation.

Legal Standards Governing Confessions

Under Article IV, Section 20 of the Constitution, individuals are entitled to the right against self-incrimination and must be informed of their rights before interrogation. Additionally, the Revised Penal Code mandates that individuals in detention be informed of the reason for their detention and of their right to counsel.

Evaluation of Dajugar's Confession

The court examined the validity of Dajugar's confession while noting that his rights might not have been fully upheld during the interrogation. Despite his claims, the presence of corroborative extrajudicial confessions from his co-accused supported the prosecution's case against him.

Findings on Participation and Penalty

The court confirmed sufficient evidence of Dajugar's active participation in the murder, but disputes arose concerning the classification of the crime's aggravating factors. Dajugar's age and the nature of his intoxication were cite

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.