Case Summary (G.R. No. L-34754)
Filing, Arraignment, and Immediate Conviction
On November 16, 1971, the information was filed. The case was set for arraignment on November 20, 1971. On that date, counsel de officio entered appearance, informed the accused of the nature of the charges and the probable penalty, and the accused declared readiness for arraignment. The trial court read and interpreted the information to the accused. The accused then entered a plea of guilty.
During the court’s examination, the accused affirmed that he understood the consequences of his plea, including the possibility of the death penalty. After confirming that he had reflected upon the consequences from the time of arrest and that, notwithstanding such risk, he remained ready to receive whatever penalty the law would impose, the trial court promulgated a decision immediately convicting him based on his plea of guilty.
Alleged Criminal Acts in the Information
The information alleged that the accused, with evident premeditation, conspired and confederated with his co-accused, and entered the Butler premises for the purpose of kidnapping Susan and Lynn Butler to extort ransom. It alleged that inside the Butler guesthouse, the accused surprised Martina Caldoza, a Butler maid, and with intent to kill, treachery, and use of superior strength, attacked her with a shotgun and stabbed her with a screw driver, causing her mortal injuries.
It further alleged that upon the approach of Mrs. Caroline Butler, the accused shot her, inflicting gunshot wounds in vital parts. The information described the killing of Martina as having been commenced through acts of execution which would have produced murder but did not, on account of timely and able medical attendance. It added that after these assaults, the accused held and threatened to kill Mrs. Butler for the purpose of extorting ransom, demanded P25,000.00, received P15,000.00, and carried away the kidnapping victim, Suzie Butler, to Botolan, Zambales.
Prosecution Evidence After the Guilty Plea
Although the trial court committed an irregularity in rendering judgment immediately after the plea, it thereafter conducted hearings for the reception of the prosecution’s evidence. The prosecution presented several witnesses, including police and military investigators and officers, a security chief at Forbes Park, and Dr. Orlando V. Salvador, who conducted the autopsy and prepared the necropsy findings, together with documentary evidence.
The evidence showed that at about 11:00 p.m. of October 31, 1971, the accused and Albino (Ben) Bohol gained entrance into the yard of Mr. Charles Butler at No. 15 Ipil Road, Forbes Park, Makati, Rizal. They stayed in the guesthouse within the yard until the morning of November 1, 1971. Around 7:30 a.m., Mate saw a man and a woman approach the guesthouse but they did not enter. About thirty minutes later, a woman entered the guesthouse. Mate and Bohol watched her as she moved. The evidence then narrated that Mate and Bohol approached Martina Caldoza, who was the woman and became surprised and afraid, shouting for assistance. Mate held Martina to stop her from shouting. Bohol then hit Martina on the head with the handle of a shotgun. When Martina became unconscious and fell, Bohol stabbed her twice at the back with a screwdriver. Mate and Bohol brought Martina to the bathroom of the guesthouse, where Bohol repeatedly stabbed her until she died.
The prosecution evidence further stated that after about five minutes, Mrs. Butler approached the guesthouse as if looking for something. Mate pointed the shotgun at her and told her not to shout. Mrs. Butler shouted and tried to run for help, but Mate shot her at the back. Mate then entered the Butler house and ordered a woman he met to accompany him to the bedroom. Inside the bedroom, Mate saw Suzie Butler, who accompanied him into one of the rooms.
When police authorities arrived and surrounded the place, Mate held Suzie as a hostage inside a locked room. An uncle of Suzie tried to negotiate for release. Mate agreed to talk with a newspaperman, Ruther Batuigas, and food was allowed inside the room. Mate ultimately negotiated for the ransom amount and accepted P15,000.00, provided that Mate would be brought by helicopter to his desired place for escape. The police officers agreed. At about 3:00 p.m. on November 1, 1971, Mate, Suzie, her uncle, and Batuigas boarded the helicopter to Botolan, Zambales, landing at about 5:30 p.m. The evidence stated that the P15,000.00 was given to Mate by Suzie’s uncle and that Suzie was released. Mate remained as the others left.
Medical Findings and Cause of Death
Dr. Orlando V. Salvador conducted the autopsy on Martina Caldoza y Cagadoc. The necropsy report described ligature marks around the ankles, multiple abrasions and contusions, a lacerated wound with a skull fracture, and a series of stab wounds to the chest and back, including injuries that penetrated the thoracic cavity and perforated lung tissue and involved the heart. The findings also included hemothorax and meningeal hemorrhage. The report gave the cause of death as stab wounds of chest and back, with a fractured skull and meningeal hemorrhage, described as traumatic and contributory.
For Caroline Butler, the evidence stated that she was shot with a shotgun and suffered gunshot wounds in vital parts that would have caused death had it not been for timely and able medical attendance.
Arrest, Recovery of Evidence, and Extrajudicial Confessions
After the helicopter escape, Mate went to the house of Mr. Juan Dizon at Pulong Bato, Botolan, and stayed there until about 3:00 a.m. of November 2, 1971, when Dizon woke him. Mate was then brought to Sitio Paitan because he would be arrested by the BSDV. He was arrested by the PC. Capt. Roman P. Madella led the apprehending group, and the authorities recovered money amounting to P13,553.00 from Mate, as well as a shotgun.
The prosecution evidence also relied heavily on Mate’s voluntary extra-judicial statements contained in exhibits identified in the record as Exhibits “A,” “B,” and “J.” Investigators and a patrolman testified that Mate voluntarily narrated the facts. Exhibit “B” included Mate’s revelation of the brown suitcase he brought to the Butler residence containing things needed to commit the crime and an asserted well-prepared plan to kidnap the Butlers’ children for ransom. Police Investigator Manolo Dizon corroborated that a brown suitcase with contents was recovered at the scene of the crime. Exhibit “J” was described as containing a detailed narration of how the crime was planned and committed and as being substantially harmonious with Exhibits “A” and “B.”
Further, the decision noted that long after conviction, on May 7, 1973, Mate testified for the prosecution against co-accused Albino Bohol, and he affirmed the narrations in the cited exhibits and elaborated on them.
Issues Raised by the Defense
The defense argued that the trial court committed serious error by rendering judgment of conviction immediately after Mate pleaded guilty and before the prosecution received evidence. The defense also complained that the prosecutor, Cornelio Melendres, allegedly failed to make a formal offer of his exhibits, though they were marked and identified.
Ruling on the Conviction Despite the Procedural Irregularity
The Court acknowledged that the trial court had indeed committed an irregularity in pronouncing judgment in open court immediately after the plea of guilty and before requiring the prosecution to present evidence. However, the Court held that the irregularity did not justify setting aside the conviction, because the judgment was supported by the accused’s judicial and extra-judicial confessions and by other evidence.
The Court relied on its prior doctrine in People v. Dumdum (L-35279, July 30, 1979, 92 SCRA 198), where it likewise recognized an irregularity in the timing of judgment after a guilty plea but sustained the conviction when supported by confessions and other evidence.
Assessment of the Confessions and Evidentiary Objections
On the alleged failure to formally offer exhibits, the Court treated the omission as trivial because the evidence was recorded and the witnesses identified the exhibits during testimony. It reasoned that even without the exhibits formally offered, the prosecution had established the case through witness identification and recorded testimony.
The Court also upheld the admissibility of Exhibits “A,” “B,” and “J” against Mate, finding that it appeared with clarity that Mate had voluntarily and spontaneously given those narrations without compulsion. The Court discounted claims that the accused’s elaborate narration implied mental abnormality. It stated that the n
...continue reading
Case Syllabus (G.R. No. L-34754)
Parties and Procedural Posture
- The People of the Philippines prosecuted Silvestre Mate y Abad, who stood as defendant-appellant on appeal from the Circuit Criminal Court of Rizal.
- The information charged the accused with Kidnapping for Ransom with Murder and Frustrated Murder.
- The trial court imposed the supreme penalty of death upon the accused after he pleaded GUILTY.
- The trial court later conducted hearings for the reception of the prosecution’s evidence after the guilty plea and immediate conviction.
- The defense on appeal questioned the trial court’s procedure and certain evidentiary oversights, but the conviction was affirmed in its entirety.
Key Factual Allegations
- The information alleged that on or about November 1, 1971, in Makati, Rizal, the accused conspired to kidnap Susan and Lynn Butler for the purpose of extorting ransom.
- The accused and his co-accused were alleged to have entered the premises of the Butler residence at No. 15 Ipil Road, Forbes Park, Makati, Rizal.
- While the accused were inside the guesthouse within the compound, the information alleged that Martina Caldoza was surprised there and was attacked with a shotgun and a screwdriver.
- The information alleged that Martina Caldoza suffered injuries that caused her death.
- The information further alleged that the accused shot Mrs. Caroline Butler while she was fleeing for help, but that her death did not occur due to timely medical attendance, characterizing the act as frustrated murder.
- The information alleged that the accused then held Caroline Butler, threatened her for ransom purposes, received PHP 15,000.00 instead of the demanded PHP 25,000.00, and carried away the kidnap victim Suzie Butler to Botolan, Zambales.
Arraignment and Guilty Plea Events
- At the arraignment set on November 20, 1971, Atty. Galvan appeared as counsel de officio and reported that he had informed the accused of the charges, probable penalty, and constitutional rights.
- The record showed that the trial court read and interpreted the information to the accused before arraignment.
- The accused entered a plea of GUILTY.
- The trial court conducted a series of questions confirming the accused’s awareness of the consequences of a guilty plea, including possible death.
- Immediately after the plea of guilt, the trial court promulgated a decision convicting the accused and imposing the supreme penalty of death.
Trial Court Conviction and Damages
- The trial court found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt of Kidnapping for Ransom with Murder and Frustrated Murder under Article 267 of the Revised Penal Code.
- The trial court sentenced the accused to suffer death.
- The trial court ordered damages for Martina Caldoza, including PHP 12,000.00 as indemnity to her heirs and PHP 20,000.00 as moral damages and PHP 10,000.00 as exemplary damages.
- The trial court ordered PHP 25,000.00 as exemplary damages in favor of Mrs. Caroline Butler.
- The trial court also ordered the accused to pay the costs.
Prosecution Evidence and Narrative
- The prosecution witnesses established that at about 11:00 p.m. on October 31, 1971, the accused entered the yard of Mr. Charles Butler at No. 15 Ipil Road, Forbes Park, Makati, Rizal with Albino (Ben) Bohol.
- The accused and Bohol stayed in the guesthouse within the Butler compound until the morning of November 1, 1971.
- The prosecution evidence showed that at about 7:30 a.m., the accused noticed a man and a woman approach but they did not enter.
- Approximately thirty minutes later, a woman entered the guesthouse, and the accused and Bohol hid and watched her movements.
- The prosecution evidence identified the entered woman as Martina Caldoza, who shouted for assistance after being surprised.
- The evidence showed that the accused held Martina to prevent her from shouting.
- The evidence showed that Ben Bohol struck Martina on the head with the handle of a shotgun.
- The evidence showed that Bohol then stabbed Martina twice at the back with a screwdriver.
- The evidence showed that the accused and Bohol moved Martina to the bathroom of the guesthouse, where Bohol repeatedly stabbed her until she died.
- The evidence showed that Mrs. Butler approached the guesthouse later, and the accused pointed the shotgun at her and told her not to shout.
- The evidence showed that Mrs. Butler tried to run away and the accused shot her at the back with the shotgun.
- The prosecution evidence showed that after the shooting, the accused proceeded into the Butlers’ house, ordered a woman he met to accompany him, and went to a bedroom where he saw Suzie Butler.
- When the police arrived, the prosecution evidence showed that the accused held Suzie as a hostage inside a locked room and negotiated for ransom.
- The evidence showed that the accused demanded a discussion with a newspaperman, and that Ruther Batuigas was allowed to enter with food.
- The evidence showed that ransom negotiation resulted in an accepted amount of PHP 15,000.00 conditioned on helicopter transport for the accused’s escape.
- The prosecution evidence showed that at about 3:00 p.m., Mate, Suzie, her uncle, and