Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Mat-An y Escad
Case
G.R. No. 215720
Decision Date
Feb 21, 2018
Oscar Mat-An was convicted of Murder for stabbing his mother-in-law and Slight Physical Injury for wounding a child, with claims of intoxication and blackout rejected.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 220514)

Applicable Law and Constitution

1987 Philippine Constitution (decision rendered in 2018)
Revised Penal Code (RPC)
• Article 248 as amended by R.A. No. 7659 (Murder)
• Article 266 (Attempted Homicide, qualified as Slight Physical Injury where intent to kill is not established)
RPC Article 63 (imposition of successive penalties)

Factual Background

On 8 April 2009 at around 11:00 a.m., Oscar entered Minda’s store, where she was cradling her granddaughter Anthonette. An argument erupted over family remittances. Witnesses Norma Gulayan and Clyde Bunhian heard moaning and saw Oscar stab Minda twice in the chest. Anthonette sustained a superficial stab wound to the nape. Neighbors and a police officer on vacation intervened, disarmed Oscar, and brought him to the station. Minda died at Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center later that day; Anthonette was treated and discharged the next morning.

Procedural History

  1. 13 April 2009 – Two Informations filed: one for Attempted Homicide (Anthonette) and one for Murder (Minda).
  2. 13 May 2009 – RTC of Baguio City consolidated the cases.
  3. 2 June 2009 – Arraignment; accused pleaded not guilty.
  4. November 2009 to February 2012 – Pre-trial and trial on merits; prosecution presented ten witnesses; accused testified in denial.
  5. 4 September 2012 – RTC rendered Joint Judgment convicting Oscar of Murder (with evident premeditation and abuse of superior strength) and Attempted Homicide; imposed reclusion perpetua and indeterminate sentence, plus damages.
  6. 25 April 2014 – Court of Appeals affirmed guilt for Murder (qualified by abuse of superior strength) but downgraded Attempted Homicide to Slight Physical Injury; adjusted penalties and damages.
  7. 21 February 2018 – Supreme Court decision on appeal.

Issue

Whether the trial and appellate courts erred in finding Oscar Escad guilty beyond reasonable doubt for the murder of Minda Babsa-ay and the injury to Anthonette Ewangan.

Supreme Court Ruling and Penalties

The appeal is dismissed. The CA Decision is affirmed with these modifications:
• Criminal Case No. 29335-R (Anthonette): Conviction for Slight Physical Injury; penalty of 20 days arresto menor; indemnify P929.00 actual damages and P5,000.00 moral damages with 6% annual interest from finality.
• Criminal Case No. 29336-R (Minda): Conviction for Murder (qualified by abuse of superior strength); sentence of reclusion perpetua; indemnify P83,763.00 actual damages, P75,000.00 civil indemnity, P75,000.00 moral damages, and P75,000.00 exemplary damages with 6% annual interest from finality.

Legal Reasoning

  1. Credibility and Positive Identification
    – Trial court properly credited eyewitnesses’ consistent accounts on material points despite minor discrepancies.
    – Denial and claimed blackout are inherently weak defenses that cannot outweigh positive, categorical identification and physical evidence.

  2. Qualification of Murder by Abuse of Superior Strength
    – Oscar, a 5'10" adult armed with a knife, attacked a 61-year-old unarmed woman burdened by an infant, demonstrating inequality of forces and exploitation of obvious advantage.
    – Evident premeditation was discarded for lack of proof regarding the precise moment of intent formation; abuse of superior strength sufficed to qualify the killing as murder.

  3. Classification of Anthonette’s Injury
    – No proof of intent to kill the child; wound was superficial.
    – Liability correctly classified under slight physical injury rather than attempted homici

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.