Title
People vs. Manzano
Case
G.R. No. 217974
Decision Date
Mar 5, 2018
Accused-appellant claimed self-defense in the fatal stabbing of Lucio Silava, but courts ruled it murder due to treachery, lack of unlawful aggression, and improper surrender.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 217974)

Key Dates

• Incident: March 19, 2010
• RTC Decision: April 17, 2012
• CA Decision: October 29, 2014
• SC Decision: March 5, 2018

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution
• Revised Penal Code (RPC)
 – Art. 248 (Murder)
 – Art. 249 (Homicide)
 – Art. 11 (Justifying Circumstances: Self-Defense)
 – Art. 63(2) (Indivisible Penalties)

Facts of the Case

On the evening of March 19, 2010, Lucio Silava and his wife Victoria were in their store in Hamtic, Antique. Appellant Rezor and his brother Resurreccion arrived, requesting to buy cigarettes. Victoria admitted them inside; both men then entered the kitchen where Lucio was dining. Victoria heard Lucio plead, “What wrong have I committed?” and saw both brothers stabbing him. Lucio ran outside within the fenced premises, but the assailants continued to stab him. He sustained fifteen stab wounds, four of which were fatal, and died of hypovolemic shock.

Razor fled to his brother Reno’s house in San Jose and surrendered to police the next day. The prosecution introduced Victoria’s eyewitness testimony, autopsy findings (Dr. Pacificador), crime‐scene photographs (Atty. Sy), and funeral expense receipts. Appellant testified that he acted in self-defense after Lucio allegedly threw stones, struck his knee, and attempted to stab him; he claimed he “blacked out” and later stabbed Lucio.

RTC Findings and Ruling

The Regional Trial Court found the appellant’s self-defense claim unconvincing. It credited Victoria’s positive, consistent, and detailed testimony, supported by blood-splatter photographs and autopsy results. The court held that:

  1. No unlawful aggression by Lucio justified appellant’s actions.
  2. The number, location, and severity of wounds negated a defensive purpose and demonstrated intent to kill.
  3. Treachery and abuse of superior strength attended the killing.
  4. Voluntary surrender was not established, as appellant fled and only surrendered after police were alerted by his brother.

Convicted beyond reasonable doubt of Murder under RPC Art. 248, appellant was sentenced to reclusion perpetua, ordered to pay P75,000 civil indemnity, P15,000 actual expenses, P25,000 moral damages, and costs.

CA Ruling

The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC decision in toto. It agreed that:
• Victoria’s testimony was credible and uncontradicted in material points.
• All elements of Murder—including treachery and abuse of superior strength—were established.
• Appellant failed to prove self-defense or voluntary surrender.

Issues on Appeal

I. Credibility given to Victoria Silava’s testimony despite alleged inconsistencies.
II. Non-appreciation of incomplete self-defense as mitigating.
III. Erroneous finding of abuse of superior strength.
IV. Failure to recognize appellant’s voluntary surrender.

Supreme Court’s Analysis and Ruling

  1. Credibility Findings: RTC’s firsthand witness assessments enjoy high respect when affirmed by the CA and unchallenged by material overlooked facts. Victoria’s clear, detailed account, supported by physical and medical evidence, was deemed wholly credible.

  2. Self-Defense: To invoke self-defense, appellant must prove unlawful aggression, reasonable necessity, and lack of provocation. No independent evidence corroborated any stone-throwing or stabbing attempt by Lucio. Physical evidence contradicted appellant’s version. The absence of unlawful aggression precludes any self-defense claim.

  3. Murder Qualifying Ci

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.