Title
People vs. Mangulab
Case
G.R. No. L-8919
Decision Date
Sep 28, 1956
Intruders robbed and killed Vicente Pacson in his home; Agustin Mangulabnan convicted of robbery with homicide, sentenced to reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-8919)

Autopsy Findings and Cause of Death

Dr. Vicente P. Llado performed the post-mortem examination and produced a signed report (Exhibit C). The autopsy recorded multiple entrance and exit gunshot wounds, including a frontal gunshot wound with exit at the left side of the head; wounds to the left arm and forearm; and a wound above the right clavicle with exit near the spinal cord between the scapulae. The stated cause of death was severe hemorrhage due to a gunshot wound of the frontal region of the forehead.

Statements and Affidavits by the Appellant

During investigation, Cipriana Tadeo identified Agustin Mangulabnan as one of the intruders. When investigated, Mangulabnan signed and subscribed affidavits before the Justice of the Peace admitting participation in the robbery and killing (Exhibits A and B). Subsequently, he executed another affidavit before the Clerk of Court (Exhibit D) in which he admitted other allegations but exculpated Crispin Estrella from prior implication.

Procedural History and Trial Court Disposition

A complaint for robbery with homicide was filed and later amended to include named co-defendants and two unidentified persons. The case was tried in the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija. The trial court convicted Agustin Mangulabnan of robbery with homicide and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua; ordered indemnities of P400 to Monica del Mundo, P132 to Cipriana Tadeo, and P6,000 to the heirs of Vicente Pacson; and awarded costs. Dionisio Sarmiento was acquitted. The information against the remaining defendants who were at large was dismissed for lack of evidence.

Motion for New Trial and Court’s Assessment

Appellant moved for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, supporting the motion with affidavits of Dr. Numeriano D. Lustre, Marino Ventura, Marcosa Mudlong, and Patricio Gonzales. The trial court denied the motion for lack of merit. On appeal the Supreme Court reviewed the settled requisites for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence: (a) discovery after trial; (b) inability to have discovered such evidence before trial with reasonable diligence; and (c) materiality of the evidence, not merely cumulative or impeaching, and of such weight as would probably change the judgment. The Court found the proffered affidavits did not satisfy these requisites and thus the denial was proper.

Admissibility and Evaluation of Exhibits

The post-mortem report (Exhibit C) was a carbon copy but bore the signature of the physician and was identified at trial; the Court held this was admissible and that appellant had failed to object contemporaneously, rendering his later objection untimely. Conversely, Exhibit 1 — an affidavit purportedly of Sgt. Adan Fernando recounting confiscation of arms and a positive ballistic report linking weapons of named civilians — was rejected by the lower court and sustained as inadmissible by the Supreme Court because it contained hearsay and, in substance, was immaterial given that two of the three intruders remained unidentified.

Legal Characterization: Robbery with Homicide and Joint Liability

The Supreme Court affirmed that the crime was robbery with homicide under Article 294, No. 1 of the Revised Penal Code. The Court relied on appellant’s admissions and Cipriana’s testimony to establish appellant’s participation in the robbery and the common concerted plan. The decision applied established doctrine that participants in a common design are jointly liable for offenses committed in pursuance of that design; unity of purpose and action arising from common design renders all parties responsible for results, irrespective of each person’s specific role. The Court further observed that for the classification as robbery with homicide it suffice

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.