Title
People vs. Manero Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 86883-85
Decision Date
Jan 29, 1993
Armed group conspired to kill suspected communist sympathizers, murdered Fr. Tulio Favali, and attempted to kill Rufino Robles; Supreme Court upheld convictions, modified damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 193945)

Overview of Events Leading to the Charges

On the morning of April 11, 1985, the accused gathered at an eatery to discuss plans for the execution of alleged communist sympathizers. The conspiring individuals noted names on a cigarette wrapper, indicating intended targets. Throughout the day, these discussions and subsequent violent actions indicated a clear conspiracy to commit murder and other violent acts against their targets.

Trial Court Findings and Convictions

The Regional Trial Court ultimately convicted the Manero brothers, along with their co-accused, of murder, attempted murder, and arson. Each accused was sentenced to penalties of reclusion perpetua for murder, varying imprisonment terms for attempted murder, and lesser terms for arson. The trial court also ordered substantial civil indemnities and attorney’s fees to be paid to the Pontifical Institute of Foreign Missions, which the priest belonged to.

Defense of Alibi and Its Rejection

The appellants claimed an alibi, stating they were engaged in other activities far from the crime scene. However, the court found their alibi unconvincing due to the proximity between their claimed locations and the scene of the crime. The evidence presented demonstrated their presence at the site throughout the day of the murder, undermining their defense.

Conspiracy and Collective Responsibility

The court established that there was clear evidence of conspiracy among the accused, demonstrating a shared intent to carry out the crimes. The evidence included the direct participation of the appellants in the events leading to the murder of Fr. Favali, showcasing that they were not just incidental witnesses but rather active participants in the conspiracy.

Impact of the Murder on the Victim's Family

Although moral damages were requested, the appellate court determined that the Pontifical Institute was not entitled to such damages, as it is a juridical entity and cannot experience emotional suffering. However, exemplary damages were granted due to the brutal nature of the crime, and the civil indemnity for Fr.

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.