Title
People vs. Magtira y Dela Cruz
Case
G.R. No. L-28255
Decision Date
Nov 25, 1983
A disabled man confessed to raping and strangling a 10-year-old girl, with circumstantial evidence and medical findings supporting his conviction for rape with homicide, resulting in a death sentence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-28255)

Facts of the Case

On June 9, 1967, Clarita, along with her siblings, was lured to the second floor of Magtira's home under suspicious circumstances. After her mother, Juanita Sarmiento, failed to locate Clarita by 4 p.m., she initiated a search and later found Clarita’s lifeless body covered by a mat in Magtira’s house. A postmortem examination conducted by Dr. Diosdado Asuncion revealed evidence of sexual assault and strangulation, indicating that Clarita had been raped before her death.

Confession and Evidence

Following the discovery of the body, Magtira was arrested by the police and later confessed to the crime, detailing how he had both raped and killed the victim. His confession was documented in an extrajudicial statement, which formed part of the prosecution's evidence. The trial court also admitted several circumstantial pieces of evidence, including blood-stained clothing associated with Magtira.

Allegations of Coercion

Magtira attempted to contest the admissibility of his confession by claiming it was obtained under coercive circumstances. He argued that he had been assaulted by police officers during the investigation, which led to his involuntary confession. However, the court established that the confession was voluntary, particularly as it was made in front of a municipal judge who clarified Magtira's rights.

Trial Court’s Findings

The trial court found Magtira guilty beyond reasonable doubt, based on both his confession and the circumstantial evidence linking him to the crime. Among these were the blood-stained trousers he allegedly attempted to have laundered shortly after the incident, and the damning testimonies from witnesses, including Clarita’s brother Valeriano who observed her going up to the house at Magtira's behest.

Legal Conclusions

The court emphasized the gravity of crimes involving minors and noted that the absence of doubt regarding Magtira's guilt warranted the imposition of the death penalty. Moreover, the court cited precedents underscoring the importanc

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.