Title
People vs. Maganon
Case
G.R. No. 234040
Decision Date
Jun 26, 2019
Accused acquitted due to procedural lapses in drug seizure; absence of DOJ/media reps during inventory compromised evidence integrity under RA 9165.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 234040)

Factual Background

On November 28, 2014, Augusto Maganon was charged with illegal sale and illegal possession of dangerous drugs under Sections 5 and 11, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165. The prosecution alleged that on November 23, 2014, Maganon unlawfully sold two sachets of methamphetamine hydrochloride ("shabu") to a police poseur buyer, and the following day, he was found in possession of four additional sachets of the same drug without legal authority.

Version of the Prosecution

The law enforcement's buy-bust operation was initiated after receiving intelligence regarding Maganon’s drug-dealing activities. On the day of the operation, a designated police officer, PO1 Marvin A. Santos, engaged with Maganon under the guise of purchasing drugs. Upon executing the buy-bust, police apprehended Maganon and seized both the drugs purchased and additional quantities found during the arrest. Evidence was documented in accordance with procedural requirements at the barangay hall, where the items were inventoried in the presence of local officials.

Version of the Defense

Maganon's defense asserted that he was wrongfully arrested without substantive evidence against him. He testified that law enforcement officers conducted an unlawful search of his home, discovering the alleged drugs under questionable circumstances. The defense argued that the absence of proper protocol during the inventory and retrieval process rendered the evidence inadmissible.

Ruling of the Regional Trial Court

The RTC convicted Maganon on November 25, 2015, finding him guilty of both charges, citing the prosecution's successful establishment of the chain of custody for the seized drugs. Consequently, the RTC imposed severe penalties for both the sale and possession of illegal drugs, including substantial fines and multiple years of imprisonment.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

The CA affirmed the RTC’s ruling on May 30, 2017, concluding that despite slight deviations from the procedural requirements delineated in the law governing custody and processing of confiscated drugs, the integrity and evidentiary value of the seized items had not been compromised.

Issue on Appeal

Maganon appealed, contending that the law enforcement officials violated the mandatory procedures outlined in Section 21, Article II of RA 9165, specifically during the marking, inventory, and photographing of the confiscated evidence. He argued that these violations created reasonable doubt regarding the integrity of the evidence against him.

Our Ruling

The Supreme Court found merit in the appeal. It emphasized that the prosecution must establish the identity of the seized drugs and the chain of custody with moral certainty. The ruling highlighted the critical importance of involving necessar

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.