Title
People vs. Magalong y Buado
Case
G.R. No. 100125
Decision Date
May 12, 1995
A 7-year-old girl was raped and killed by two men, with a third aiding in the crime. Despite alibis and inconsistencies, the Supreme Court convicted the perpetrators as principals, sentencing them to reclusion perpetua and ordering indemnity to the victim’s family.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 100125)

Background of the Incident

Cecilia Arabis was discovered dead and discarded in a canal, with evidence suggesting she was a victim of sexual assault and subsequent murder. On November 17, 1987, Cecilia visited the house of Arsenio Aquino while Magalong and Lim were present, both allegedly under the influence of marijuana. The trio of accused engaged in acts leading to Cecilia’s death, with Magalong instigating the violence and sexual assault against her.

Proceedings and Testimonies

During the trial, various witnesses, including law enforcement personnel and family members of the victim, provided testimonies regarding the circumstances surrounding Cecilia’s death. Crucially, Arsenio Aquino, initially an accused, was later discharged by the trial court to testify as a state witness. His testimony, along with medical evidence from an autopsy conducted by Dr. Richard A. Patilano, established the facts of the assault and allowed the prosecution to build a compelling case against Magalong and Lim.

Defense Arguments

The defense for Magalong consisted mainly of a denial of involvement, supported by alibi witnesses who claimed he was elsewhere during the time of the crime. Lim did not present a defense and opted for a demurrer to evidence. However, the court found that the alibis and defenses presented could not eclipse the clear, detailed accounts provided by state witness Aquino and corroborated by the physical evidence.

Court's Findings and Conclusion

The trial court found both Magalong and Lim guilty of rape with homicide. It emphasized the weight of Aquino's testimony despite the defense's attempts to discredit it due to alleged inconsistencies. The court acknowledged the gravity of the offense, stating that had the crimes been committed after the enactment of Republic Act No. 7659, the accused would have faced the death penalty.

Determination of Penalties

The Court ultimately modified the trial court's decision, convicting both accused as principals rather than Lim being seen merely as an accomplice, as his actions constituted significant participation in the crime. Both Magalong and Lim were sentenced to reclusion perpetu

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.