Title
People vs. Madali
Case
G.R. No. 67803-04
Decision Date
Jul 30, 1990
A police officer and his wife were convicted for murder and frustrated murder after a violent altercation escalated into a fatal shooting, with claims of self-defense rejected due to lack of credible evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 207406)

Facts of the Case

On October 31, 1979, the Madalis confronted the victims in a violent encounter following an earlier incident involving their son, Ramon, and Felix Gasang. Testimonies revealed that Ricarte Madali, a patrolman, threatened Felix at a police station and escalated to violently accosting Agustin Reloj and ultimately shooting Felix and his father, Cipriano. Evidence demonstrated that the Madalis acted in concert, with Annie assisting her husband during the violent episode.

Judicial Findings

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Romblon found the Madalis guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for the murders of Felix and Cipriano Gazang, alongside the frustrated murder of Agustin Reloj and Merlinda Gasang. The court highlighted that the actions of the defendants showed treachery, as evidenced by the sudden and calculated manner of attack upon the victims.

Sentences Imposed

For their crimes, the Madalis received various penalties. They were sentenced to reclusion perpetua for the murders of Cipriano and Felix, while for the frustrated murder of Agustin Reloj, each was given an indeterminate penalty ranging from six years to twelve years of reclusion temporal. Additionally, they were ordered to pay civil indemnity and damages to the victims' heirs.

Defense Arguments

The accused mounted a defense primarily asserting self-defense. They claimed that their home was attacked with stones by the victims prior to the shooting. However, the court found insufficient evidence to substantiate this claim, noting the lack of corroborating witnesses and the contradictions in their testimonies.

Court’s Reasoning on Self-Defense

The appellate court elucidated that for self-defense to be tenable, it needs to be shown that the defendant faced an imminent unlawful attack that justified the use of force. The court concluded that the Madalis’ testimony did not meet the burden of proof required to validate claims of self-defense, as there was no clear, immediate threat that warranted their lethal response.

Conspiracy and Accomplice Liability

While the RTC found both Ricarte and Annie directly culpable, the appellate ruling modified Annie's culpability to that of an accomplice. It concluded her actions—such as beaming a flashlight at the victims—while assistingRicarte, did not equate to direct participation in the execution of the murders. The court determined that her assistance alone did not raise to the level of conspiracy.

Credibility of Witnesses

The court emphasized the credibility of prosecution witnesses, notably Agustin Reloj and Merlinda Gasang, who provided consistent accounts of the Madalis’ actions during the incident. The court underscored that credibility issues were primarily a matter for

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.