Case Summary (G.R. No. L-12088)
Background of the Case
Moro Sumaguina Macarandang was charged with illegal possession of firearms, specifically a Riot Gun and ammunition. The charge stemmed from an incident that occurred on or about June 8, 1954, in the Municipality of Marantao, Lanao. The information filed against him alleged that he possessed these items without a proper license or permit from the competent authority, thereby violating laws governing firearm possession.
Admission of Ownership and Legal Argument
In the appeal, Macarandang admitted that he owned and possessed the firearm and ammunition stated in the information. However, he argued that his possession was legally justified through an appointment he received from the Governor of Lanao, Dimakuta, on October 1, 1953. This appointment designated him as a secret agent tasked with assisting in law enforcement and maintaining peace in the area. The text of the appointment letter indicated his authority to carry the specified firearm and was intended to facilitate his duties related to crime detection and public safety.
Evaluation of the Governor's Authority
The trial court concluded that the Governor lacked the authority to issue firearms licenses or permits. However, Macarandang’s defense hinged on the interpretation of section 879 of the Revised Administrative Code, which provides exemptions for "peace officers" regarding firearms licensing requirements. His appointment as a secret agent, aligned with his responsibilities in maintaining peace and order, placed him within the definition of a peace officer for the purposes of the law.
Interpretation of Legal Exemptions
The appellate court reviewed the nature of Macarandang's appointment and its alignment with the definition of a peace officer as provided in the Revised Administrative Code. It found that the responsibilities bestowed upon him, particularly the authority to execute public safety measures and detect crimes, justified his classification as a peace officer. Consequently, this interpretation supported his legal claim to possess the firearm wit
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. L-12088)
Case Background
- The case involves Moro Sumaguina Macarandang, who was accused of illegal possession of firearms.
- The trial took place in the Court of First Instance of Lanao, where the information filed against him stated that on June 8, 1954, in Marantao, Lanao, he unlawfully possessed a Riot Gun and eight rounds of ammunition without the required license or permit.
Charges and Allegations
- The specific charge against Macarandang was based on the assertion that he kept and had custody of a Riot Gun (Winchester, 12 GA, SN-942131) and ammunition without proper authorization.
- The prosecution's case relied heavily on the lack of a legal permit for possessing the firearm and ammunition.
Defense Argument
- Macarandang admitted to owning and possessing the firearm and ammunition.
- He presented as his defense an appointment from Governor Dimakuta, dated October 1, 1953, which designated him as a secre