Title
People vs. Macalindong
Case
Adm. Case No. 349
Decision Date
May 25, 1946
Defendant convicted of theft for stealing wheelbarrow wheels valued at P10 from Batangas Provincial Government; penalty modified based on proven value.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 7231)

Factual Background

The facts emerged from witness testimonies that, prior to June 12, 1942, the Provincial Government of Batangas had an inventory of approximately 500 steel wheelbarrows stored in a bodega of the old provincial government building. Many of these wheelbarrows were defective, but the individual wheels remained usable. Upon returning to duty around June 1942, clerk Eustaquio Casenas discovered the disappearance of about 100 wheelbarrow wheels. The defendant, Geronimo Macalindong, allegedly claimed to have purchased ten wheelbarrow wheels during a public auction and solicited assistance from Laureano Ilagan and Eduardo Bombeta to retrieve these wheels from the provincial building. Witnesses testified that Macalindong distributed some of the wheels as compensation to his helpers.

Evidence Presented

The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of several witnesses, including employees from the district engineer’s office and local law enforcement who confirmed the theft and the suspicious circumstances surrounding Macalindong's actions. The wheels, valued at P10 instead of P135 as initially alleged, were presented as evidence during the trial, supporting the claim that a theft had occurred. Conversely, the defense asserted that Macalindong had legitimately purchased the wheels from Ilagan and Bombeta, challenging the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses.

Credibility of Witnesses

In evaluating witness credibility, the court took into account contradictions between the testimonies of the prosecution's witnesses and an independent witness, Marciano Ebreo, regarding the timing of the wheelbarrow thefts. The defense argued that the discrepancies raised reasonable doubt about the testimony given by Ilagan and Bombeta. The court, however, determined that despite the contradictions, the prosecution’s witnesses were credible and presented a coherent account of the events leading to the theft.

Legal Findings

The verdict from the trial court found Macalindong guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of theft under Article 309 of the Revised Penal Code, specifically noting that no aggravating or mitigating circumstances were present, which influenced the chosen penalty. The lower court sentenced him to a medium degree of arresto mayor, amounting to two months and one day, alongside accessory penalties and indemnification to the Provincial Government of Batangas for the stolen items.

Dissenting Opinion

Justice Perfecto presented a dissenting opinion emphasizing the insufficiency of evidence to convict Macalindong. He noted the implausibil

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.