Title
People vs. Mabong
Case
G.R. No. L-9805-06
Decision Date
Mar 29, 1957
Rural policeman detained Dionisio Mabong after he stabbed someone. Despite 18-hour detention delay, charges were valid; habeas corpus denied.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-9805-06)

Incident Overview

On the afternoon of May 20, 1955, Rufo Verano heard commotion indicating that Dionisio Mabong was acting violently. Armed with a club, Verano approached the scene and witnessed Mabong stabbing Cipriano Tabel with a bolo. Verano demanded Mabong drop the weapon, but upon refusal, he struck Mabong, causing him to stumble. Verano then restrained Mabong, seized the bolo, and transported him on a small boat to deliver him to local law enforcement.

Legal Proceedings Initiated

On May 23, 1955, following an investigation, Mabong was charged with murder in two separate informations presented by the chief of police to the Justice of the Peace of Lianga. During preliminary investigation, Mabong pleaded guilty, leading to the transfer of the cases to the court of first instance.

Motion to Quash and Habeas Corpus Petition

Subsequently, Mabong filed a motion to quash the charges along with a petition for habeas corpus. His primary argument hinged on the assertion that his detention was illegal since authorities failed to present him before judicial authorities within the legally mandated period of eighteen hours, as set forth in Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code. Mabong contended that the subsequent filing of charges did not validate his initial unlawful detention.

Relevant Legal Provisions

Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code delineates penalties for public officials who fail to deliver detained persons to the proper judicial authorities within specified periods based on the gravity of the crime. Specifically, it mandates an eighteen-hour timeframe for serious crimes. While it allows for potential criminal liability against the detaining officer, the law does not state that an indictment for an offense becomes invalid due to such illegal detention.

Court’s Rationale on Detention Validity

The court found that although Mabong was detained for more than three days before charges were formally filed, the lack of a warrant for his arrest did not impact the legality of his confinement. Importantly, once criminal charges were filed, his detention became lawful. The court emphasized that resolving the potential illegality of the detention through a quashal of the information would serve little purpose, as it would necessitat

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.