Title
People vs. Lobitania
Case
G.R. No. 142380
Decision Date
Sep 5, 2002
SPO1 Lobitania convicted of aggravated carnapping with murder after forcibly taking a tricycle, killing its driver; death penalty upheld due to abuse of superior strength.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 73611)

Applicable Law and Constitutional Basis

1987 Philippine Constitution governs capital punishment cases decided after 1990.
Republic Act No. 6539 (Anti-Carnapping Act of 1992), as amended by RA 7659 (Death Penalty Law, effective December 31, 1993)
Revised Penal Code Arts. 14, 63 (indivisible penalties)

Charge and Information

Accused charged with carnapping with murder under R.A. 6539, as amended by R.A. 7659. Allegations:
– Grave abuse of authority, force and intimidation
– Conspiracy with four companions to seize a Yamaha tricycle (Plate No. 2N-7910)
– Shooting, hog-tying and ejecting the driver, causing instantaneous death

Trial Proceedings and Plea

Arraignment: August 17, 1999, plea of not guilty
Prosecution Evidence:
• Eyewitness testimony of Jolito Sanchez detailing the conduct of accused and companions;
• Recovery of sidecar and motorcycle in Tarlac;
• Autopsy report confirming death by gunshot–induced hypovolemic shock.
Defense Evidence:
• Alibi testimony by SPO1 Michael Legaspi (work attendance records December 6–7, 1998);
• Alibi testimony by wife Valeriana Lobitania;
• Denial of participation and challenge to Sanchez’s credibility (alleged gang affiliation).

Issues on Appeal

I. Whether prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
II. Whether damages awarded were proper.

Findings on Credibility and Conspiracy

– Trial court properly assessed Jolito Sanchez’s testimony as clear, categorical and consistent; defense failed to prove improper motive or absence from scene.
– Conspiracy established by coordinated acts: accused ordered route change, accomplices fired, subdued and abandoned the driver, then jointly commandeered the vehicle.

Rejection of Alibi and Denial

– Alibi must be supported by disinterested witnesses and show physical impossibility; wife’s testimony alone insufficient.
– Travel time from Pangasinan (3 a.m.) to Quezon City (6:30 a.m.) plausible.

Elements of Qualified Carnapping

– Unlawful taking of motor vehicle with intent to gain (R.A. 6539 § 2).
– Occasional or incidental killing of the driver qualifies the carnapping.
– Absence of mitigating circumstances; presence of aggravating circumstance (abuse of superior strength).

Aggravating Circumstances and Penalty

– Abuse of superior strength proven by numeric and firepower advantage over unarmed victim.
– Treachery and use of unlicensed firearms not considered:
• Treachery applies only to crimes against persons, whereas qualified carnapping is a special crime against property.
• Unlicensed firearm use not alleged in information.
– Under R.A. 7659 and RPC Art. 63, penalty of death is proper for qualified carnapping with murder.




...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.