Title
People vs. Licayan
Case
G.R. No. 203961
Decision Date
Jul 29, 2015
Two men convicted of kidnapping for ransom in 2001; new evidence and co-accused testimonies failed to overturn their conviction. Victims' positive identification upheld; death penalty commuted to reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 203961)

Background of the Case

On August 15, 2001, the Supreme Court affirmed the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Marikina City’s decision convicting Licayan and Lara of kidnapping for ransom, sentencing them to death. The Court modified the RTC ruling by ordering the accused-appellants to pay P50,000.00 each in moral damages but deleting the award of actual damages. Following this, the Court noted that records should be forwarded to the President for possible clemency under R.A. No. 7659.

Events Following Conviction

The Motion for Reconsideration filed by Licayan and Lara was denied on October 9, 2001, and the decision became final on November 9, 2001. A writ of execution was issued by the RTC for January 30, 2004; however, just days before the execution, two co-accused were arrested, prompting the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) to request a reopening of the case to allow for further evidence.

Suspension of Execution

On January 26, 2004, the Court voted to suspend Licayan and Lara's execution for thirty days. Subsequently, on February 17, 2004, the Court granted the PAO's Urgent Motion to Reopen the Case. The case was remanded to the RTC for the reception of additional evidence, while the evidence from the initial trial was preserved.

Second Arraignment and Trial

On April 19, 2005, the RTC arraigned Mabansag and Delos Reyes, who pleaded not guilty. The prosecution charged both with conspiring and kidnapping Co and Manaysay for ransom amounting to P10 million. The prosecution relied on eyewitness testimonies detailing how the complainants were abducted and detained, as well as evidence of the armed confrontation.

Convictions and Appeals

On February 17, 2009, the RTC convicted Licayan, Lara, and Delos Reyes for Kidnapping for Ransom under Article 267 of the Revised Penal Code, sentencing each to reclusion perpetua. They were held liable for P50,000.00 in moral damages to each complainant but were acquitted in a separate robbery charge due to insufficient evidence.

Progression to Higher Courts

The decision from the RTC was upheld by the Court of Appeals on July 4, 2012. Following their appeals, the Supreme Court carefully reconsidered the circumstances surrounding the kidnapping, including the identities of the accused and the reliability of witness testimonies.

Defense and Counterarguments

During retrial proceedings, the accused-appellants presented alleged newly discovered evidence and asserted inconsistent identification by the victims. However, testimonies showed that Co had recognized both Licayan and Lara during their captivity, affirming that their identification was reliable.

Judgment and Penal Consequences

The Supreme Court confi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.