Title
People vs. Libria
Case
G.R. No. L-6585
Decision Date
Jul 16, 1954
Pedro Libria, motivated by revenge after being provoked by Jaime Idloy, planned and executed Idloy's murder with evident premeditation and treachery. Despite mitigating circumstances, Libria was convicted of murder and sentenced to reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-6585)

Trial Court Findings

The Court of First Instance of Leyte found Libria guilty of murder, citing treachery as an aggravating circumstance. As a consequence, he was sentenced to reclusion perpetua and ordered to indemnify Idloy’s heirs in the amount of P4,000. The court established that the guilt of Libria was proven beyond a reasonable doubt through sufficient evidence provided during trial.

Sequence of Events

The incident began with a confrontation during the fiesta where Idloy, believing that Campo was responsible for collecting money, demanded cash from him. When Campo denied this, Idloy resorted to violence. This pattern of aggressive behavior continued when Idloy physically confronted Libria during a dance. Two weeks later, Libria sought revenge against Idloy, confronting him with a carbine and ultimately shooting him multiple times, leading to Idloy’s death.

Evidence and Testimony

The case included testimonies from Campo and his wife, who supported the prosecution's narrative. Campo witnessed the shooting, and his initial involvement in the case raised questions about the credibility of his testimony. However, the trial court found that the evidence established Libria’s presence at the scene and his direct involvement in the murder, effectively undermining his claims of an alibi.

Defense and Alibi

Libria attempted to deny his involvement by asserting an alibi, claiming he was busy making copra and later attending a drinking party. The trial court rejected this defense, finding that his alibi was not credible considering the established facts of his actions and presence at the murder scene.

Determination of Penalty

The trial court's sentence of reclusion perpetua was questioned by the Solicitor General, who argued for the maximum penalty of death. However, the court found that while evident premeditation and treachery were present, the killing occurred several days after the provocation, which reduced the i

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.