Title
People vs. Liad y Beigar
Case
G.R. No. 133815-17
Decision Date
Mar 22, 2001
Lydia Cuenca was abducted, robbed, and killed during a carjacking; appellants convicted of robbery with homicide but acquitted of illegal firearms possession due to lack of evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 218628)

Incident Overview

On February 28, 1996, around 7:00 PM, Lydia Cuenca was driving her vehicle along Commonwealth Avenue, followed by her husband Manuel in another car. As Lydia attempted a U-turn, three armed assailants approached her vehicle, forcibly trying to gain entry. Despite their attempts, including gunfire that struck Lydia, the assailants managed to break a window and enter her vehicle, ultimately speeding off with Lydia inside. The incident lasted approximately five to ten minutes, during which Manuel attempted to pursue the assailants but failed. Support was sought from bystanders, and the police were alerted to the unfolding robbery.

Police Response and Initial Investigation

Upon receiving multiple reports about the robbery, a police team, including several officers, was dispatched to the scene. They found Lydia severely injured and proceeded to take her to the hospital, where she succumbed to her injuries. Various pieces of evidence were recovered, including firearms from the suspects and the victim's belongings. A confrontation with the suspects ensued at a nearby compound where a shootout occurred, leading to the apprehension of the accused-appellants.

Autopsy and Forensic Evidence

An autopsy was performed on Lydia Cuenca by Dr. Alvin David of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), revealing two fatal gunshot wounds. The forensic analysis indicated that the wounds were consistent with shots fired from a caliber .38 firearm. Ballistic examinations supported the findings, linking the bullets retrieved from the victim's body to the firearms possessed by the accused.

Criminal Charges Filed

Both Edgardo Liad and Jun Valderama were charged with robbery with homicide under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code, along with illegal possession of firearms. The prosecution presented evidence, including testimony from Manuel Cuenca, witnesses, and police officers, to establish a chain of events leading to the robbery and the victim's death.

Defense and Testimonies

The accused-appellants denied their involvement in the crime. Valderama claimed he was selling goods at the time of the robbery and was wrongfully arrested by the police, alleging coercion and torture to extract a confession. Liad admitted to his presence at the crime scene but denied participating in the robbery. The defense aimed to disprove the prosecution's narrative by providing alternative explanations for their actions during the incident.

Trial Court Decision

The Regional Trial Court found the accused-appellants guilty of robbery with homicide and illegal possession of firearms. They were sentenced to reclusion perpetua and ordered to pay damages to the heirs of Lydia Cuenca. The court emphasized the presence of a conspiracy among the perpetrators and highlighted the positive identifications made by Manuel Cuenca as credible.

Appeal and Judicial Review

On appeal, the accused-appellants contested their identification as co-conspirators and challenged the validity of the illegal possession of firearm charges. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction for robbery with homicide, concluding that the prosecution met the burden of proof regarding conspiracy and participation in the cr

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.