Title
People vs. Lagrana y Manibo
Case
G.R. No. L-68790
Decision Date
Jan 23, 1987
Lagrana struck Adarlo with a wooden piece, causing fatal head trauma. Convicted of murder with treachery, Lagrana claimed self-defense; Salazar, an accomplice, also convicted. Indemnity modified.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 146364)

Factual Background

The prosecution's evidence indicates that on the night of December 3, 1981, Benito Adarlo was seated by the roadside with Frangeline Salazar holding his arm. Carlo Lagrana approached, illuminated the victim's face with a flashlight, and violently struck him on the head with a wooden stick, causing the victim to fall unconscious. The victim succumbed to his injuries on December 6, 1981, as confirmed by the autopsy, which indicated that the cause of death was "shock secondary to severe intracranial hemorrhage due to skull fracture from head trauma."

Eyewitness Testimonies

Nestor Adarlo, the victim’s brother, was present at the scene and attempted to assist his brother but was confronted by Lagrana. Another eyewitness, Pio Sigalat, corroborated the events by confirming seeing Lagrana strike the victim. Following the attack, both Lagrana and Salazar were questioned by police but were initially released. Charges of murder were filed against them, leading to a trial, where Lagrana was first tried, while Salazar faced trial later due to his arrest in 1983.

Defense and Trial Court Findings

Lagrana claimed self-defense, asserting that he was threatened by the intoxicated victim, who allegedly lunged at him with a knife. Salazar contended he was frightened by the victim’s behavior. The trial court rejected their defenses, ruling that the attack was intentional and characterized by treachery, given that Lagrana had the opportunity to strike without facing any risk from the victim’s actions.

Sentences and Financial Obligations

The trial court convicted Lagrana of murder and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua (life imprisonment) while condemning Salazar as an accomplice to an indeterminate penalty. Both were ordered to indemnify the legal heirs of Benito Adarlo, with specific amounts attributed to each accused for actual damages.

Appeal Points Raised

Lagrana appealed, acknowledging his conviction but contesting the absence of a mitigating circumstance for voluntary surrender, which he argued should have been considered. The court determined that his and Salazar's subsequent reporting t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.