Title
People vs. Lagarto y Petilla
Case
G.R. No. 118828
Decision Date
Feb 29, 2000
Seven-year-old Angel Alquiza was brutally raped and killed in 1994; three men were convicted, with two sentenced to death based on witness testimony and forensic evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 266754)

Factual Background

On 2 August 1994, the corpse of Angel Alquiza was discovered in a sack in a flooded area in Manila. The victim had sustained severe injuries indicative of sexual assault and homicide. The key witnesses, including family members and police officers, provided accounts leading to the identification and apprehension of the accused.

Crime Investigation and Evidence

Initial investigations revealed that Angel went missing after she left home to buy food. Eyewitness accounts described her being in the company of a known pedicab driver, Abundio Lagunday, who later implicated the appellants during custodial questioning. Further testimonies indicated that eyewitness Herminia Barlam saw the accused commit the crime, providing a detailed description of the acts committed against the victim.

Medical Findings

The autopsy performed by Dr. Lagat confirmed multiple stab wounds, traumatic injuries, and identified the cause of death as homicide due to the inflicted injuries. Key postmortem findings underscored the brutality of the crime, with extensive lacerations and dismemberment.

Judicial Proceedings

The trial court found Lagarto and Cordero guilty of rape with homicide and initially sentenced them to reclusion perpetua. However, following a motion by the prosecutor, the penalty was amended to death after the appellate court ruled that the trial court had erred in imposing the lesser sentence.

Appeals Raised by Defendants

Both accused filed appeals asserting that:

  1. There was insufficient evidence linking them to the crime, particularly questioning the credibility of witness testimonies.
  2. They provided alibis that were not adequately considered.
  3. The identification made by prosecution witnesses was flawed and not credible.
  4. They were subjected to illegal arrest and lacked proper preliminary investigation.

Court's Findings and Rulings

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s judgment, emphasizing the weight of testimony from Barlam, who was deemed competent despite her disabilities. The court noted that her consistent accounts and the autopsy findings corroborated the prosecution's claims of conspiracy among the accused to commit the heinous acts. The court reiterated that in instances of conspiracy, the actions of any one participant are attributable to all.

Penalty and Civil Liabilities

Given the gravity of the crime and the aggravating circumstance of cruelty, the court affir

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.