Title
People vs. Lachica y Llamas
Case
G.R. No. 143677
Decision Date
May 9, 2002
A man convicted of raping his 5-year-old niece had his death sentence reduced to life imprisonment due to insufficient proof of the victim's age and unalleged familial relationship in the case information.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 143677)

Procedural Background

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, found Benito Lachica guilty of qualified rape and sentenced him to death through a decision dated April 28, 2000. The Information filed on September 30, 1998, alleges that the appellant, taking advantage of his position as the uncle of the five-year-old victim, committed carnal knowledge against her will.

Facts of the Case - Prosecution's Version

On July 1, 1998, around 3:00 to 4:00 PM, the victim, Sharmaine, was playing near the accused's house when he called her inside. The prosecution details an account of the appellant removing his pants and inserting an object into Sharmaine’s vagina, causing her pain. Following the incident, Sharmaine reported her discomfort to her grandmother, who examined her and observed swelling in her genital area. Medical examinations subsequently revealed symptoms consistent with sexual assault, including gonorrhea.

Facts of the Case - Defense's Version

The defense contended that Benito Lachica was a tricycle driver and provided an alibi for the time the incident allegedly occurred. He maintained that he did not inflict any punishment on his niece and claimed that he could not be responsible for the act alleged against him.

Ruling of the Trial Court

The RTC found the victim's testimony credible, rejecting the appellant's denial and alibi. The trial court determined that the evidence solidified a conviction of qualified rape, resulting in the imposition of the death penalty.

Issues on Appeal

The appellant raised the issue that the trial court erred in the imposition of the death penalty, questioning the prosecution's failure to prove the victim's age and the relationship between the appellant and the victim as a qualifying circumstance.

Court's Ruling on Credibility of Testimony

The court emphasized the stringent scrutiny required when assessing testimonies in rape cases, particularly those involving child victims. After analyzing the victim's testimony, the court concluded that it was consistent, detailed, and believable, reinforcing the conviction based on credible evidence against the accused.

Main Legal Issues Addressed

The court pointed out a significant procedural flaw in the Information. Both the victim's minority and her relationship with the accused, as qualifying circumstances under Article 266-B of the Revised Penal Code, must be specifically alleged and proven to justify the imposition of the death penalty. The absence of evidence, such as the victim’s birth certificate, undermined the prosecution’s claim that she was below seven ye

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.