Title
People vs. Jaymalin
Case
G.R. No. 90452
Decision Date
Oct 19, 1992
Mario Jaymalin convicted for possessing and selling 7.5 kilos of marijuana in a 1983 buy-bust operation; Supreme Court affirmed guilt, modified penalty to life imprisonment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 90452)

Applicable Law

The legal framework governing the case includes the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972 (RA 6425) and its subsequent amendments, particularly those brought about by Presidential Decree Nos. 44, 1675, 1683, 1708, and Batas Pambansa Blg. 179, which establish the definitions and penalties for drug-related offenses.

Factual Background of the Incident

On the evening of October 20, 1983, law enforcement personnel from the INP Ifugao Command conducted a buy-bust operation following information about a planned sale of marijuana. The operation was spearheaded by Lt. Pedro Dulnuan and involved multiple undercover officers. They encountered the accused, Mario Jaymalin, who was reported to have approached them under the pretense of selling marijuana. During the sale, an altercation occurred involving Mario's brother, Francisco, who fired upon the police, leading to a series of events that resulted in Francisco's death and Mario’s subsequent arrest.

Prosecution's Evidence

During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence, including testimonies from law enforcement officers who conducted the operation. The marijuana was seized and later analyzed, confirming its nature. Two officers, Lt. Danao and Cpl. Kimmayong, testified about the transaction and the arrest, stating that they had identified the illegal substance recovered from Mario as marijuana.

Defense's Testimony

The defense presented an alternative narrative, with Mario asserting that he was merely looking for his daughter and stumbled into the situation unintentionally. He claimed not to know his brother during the confrontation. However, his defense narrative was deemed inconsistent and implausible, especially given the circumstances leading to his arrest.

Trial Court Decision

The Regional Trial Court found Mario Jaymalin guilty of violating the Dangerous Drugs Act, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment and imposing a fine of P20,000. The verdict was challenged by the defendant on the grounds of alleged inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence and claims of wrongful arrest.

Court of Appeals Findings

The appellate court conducted a thorough examination of the alleged inconsistencies highlighted by the defense. It concluded that the discrepancies were minor and did not undermine the case's fundamental credibility, as there was significant corroboration among the testimonies regarding critical facts of the case. The court reinforced that minor variances in witness recollections over time are common and should not negate the core integrity of their accounts.

Conclusion of the Court

Upon

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.