Title
People vs. Jaurigue
Case
Adm. Matter No. 384
Decision Date
Feb 21, 1946
Avelina Jaurigue, provoked by repeated harassment, stabbed Amado Capina in a chapel after he touched her without consent. Convicted of homicide, mitigating factors reduced her penalty.

Case Summary (Adm. Matter No. 384)

Petitioner and Respondent

Plaintiff-Appellee: The People of the Philippines
Defendant-Appellant: Avelina Jaurigue

Key Dates

Offense Committed: September 20, 1942
Appeal Brief Filed: June 10, 1944
Decision Rendered: February 21, 1946

Applicable Law

1935 Philippine Constitution (in force at decision date)
Revised Penal Code (Act No. 3815) – provisions on murder, homicide, legitimate defense, mitigating and aggravating circumstances
Indeterminate Sentence Law (Act No. 4103)

Procedural History

Avelina and Nicolas Jaurigue were charged with murder. The trial court acquitted Nicolas but convicted Avelina of homicide, sentencing her to an indeterminate term of prision mayor (minimum seven years, four months and one day) to reclusión temporal (maximum thirteen years, nine months and eleven days), with accessory penalties, P2,000 indemnity to the heirs, half the costs, and credit for half of her preventive imprisonment. Avelina appealed to the Court of Appeals, raising three assignments of error concerning legitimate defense of honor, mitigating circumstances, and the alleged aggravating circumstance of committing the crime in a sacred place.

Factual Background

From early September 1942, Amado Capina repeatedly courted Avelina without consent, even seizing her handkerchief and making unwanted physical advances. After slapping and repelling him on one occasion, Avelina armed herself with a fan knife for self-protection. On September 15, Amado clandestinely entered her bedroom at night and fondled her, but she merely called for help. On September 20, she learned that Amado was boasting that she had solicited him to elope and threaten self-harm.

Chapel Incident

At about 8:00 PM on September 20, 1942, during a well-attended, brightly lit religious service in a Seventh-Day Adventist chapel, Amado sat beside Avelina and placed his hand on her upper right thigh. Viewing this as a grave affront to her honor, Avelina drew her fan knife. After Amado seized her hand, she retrieved the knife with her other hand and delivered a single stab at the base of his neck, inflicting a mortal wound.

Surrender and Preliminary Inquiry

Immediately after the stabbing, Avelina surrendered to Barrio Lieutenant Casimiro Lozada, stating, “I place myself at your disposal.” Under his advice she and her father secured their home pending arrival of municipal authorities. When police arrived, Avelina voluntarily surrendered the knife, gave an account of the incident and her prior maltreatment by Amado, and accompanied officers to headquarters for written statements.

Legitimate Defense of Honor

The Court recognized that Philippine jurisprudence and criminological authority allow a woman to employ reasonable means, including deadly force, to protect her honor against unlawful aggression such as attempted rape or indecent assault. However, the Court found that in the chapel—well-lit and populated by her father, the barrio lieutenant, and other officials—there was no genuine risk of rape. Thus, although Amado’s touching was an assault on her honor, Avelina’s use of lethal force was excessive and could not fully exculpate her.

Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances

The trial court’s imposition of an aggravating circumstance—commission in a sacred place—was rejected for lack of proof of murderous intent upon entering the chapel. Conversely, the Court identified three qualified mitigating circumstances:

  1. Voluntary and immediate surrender to an authority (United States v. Fortaleza).
  2. Action in the immediate vindication of a grave offense that aroused passion and temporary loss of self-control.
  3. Lack of intent to kill, evidenced by a single stab aimed at punishing the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.