Title
People vs. Jalandoni
Case
G.R. No. L-57555
Decision Date
May 30, 1983
Teresa Jalandoni issued checks between accounts, later dishonored, but acquitted of estafa due to lack of fraudulent intent, prior overdraft privileges, and efforts to settle obligations.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 254586)

Facts of the Case

Between September 8 and 10, 1976, Jalandoni issued personal checks against her account at the Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (RCBC), totaling P2,150,000.00. These checks were deposited at her BPI account, leading to checks drawn against this deposit being honored by BPI under the pretense that they were funded. The checks were subsequently dishonored due to insufficient funds, prompting BPI to demand repayment. The controversy revolves around whether Jalandoni acted with fraudulent intent in these transactions.

Judgment by the Trial Court

The trial court found Jalandoni guilty of estafa as defined under Article 315, paragraph 2(a) of the Revised Penal Code, sentencing her to reclusion perpetua and ordering her to indemnify BPI for P1,600,000.00, the balance of the amount swindled.

Appellant's Defense

Jalandoni does not dispute the transactions but argues that she had been granted overdraft (OD) privileges by the bank, suggesting that she did not intend to defraud BPI. Testimony presented indicates that she had a long-standing relationship with the bank and had been allowed to draw against uncollected funds previously.

Evidence of Overdraft Privileges

Testimony from bank officials, including former branch managers, highlighted that Jalandoni's checks were honored based on her good credit standing and existing OD privileges. This indicates that the bank had historically accepted the possibility of checks being honored against uncollected deposits, reducing the weight of the fraud allegations.

Lack of Criminal Intent

The court assessed several circumstances undermining the claim of fraudulent intent. Jalandoni’s actions, such as allowing one of the checks to clear and her choice to issue checks to third parties instead of withdrawing funds for herself, were interpreted as inconsistent with the behavior expected from a person intent on committing fraud.

Arguments on Resulting Damage

The amount claimed as damage, initially P1,600,000.00, was argued by Jalandoni to have been minimized due to her repayment efforts and collateral offered to the bank. She indicated that one of her checks in the total amount of P250,000.00 was mortgaged, and she also provided jewelry worth P300,000.00 to the bank, further illustrating her lack of intent to defraud.

Final Ruling

Given that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.