Case Summary (G.R. No. 197813)
Procedural Background
The trial commenced in the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 18, Malolos, Bulacan, where both accused-appellants were found guilty of murder as defined under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code. The RTC's decision was affirmed in its entirety by the Court of Appeals (CA), leading to the current appeal by Edwin and Alfredo.
Charges and Evidence
The accused were charged under an Information detailing the murder committed against Wilfredo. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimony primarily from Wilfredo’s daughter, Rachel, and his wife, Rowena, who both described the circumstances leading to Wilfredo's death. Rachel asserted she witnessed the attack, which involved Edwin covering her father's head with a t-shirt and Alfredo and Jesus striking him with a long iron bar, leading to serious injuries that resulted in his death.
Defense Argument
In contrast, Edwin and Alfredo claimed innocence, suggesting that Jesus was the sole perpetrator. They contended that they approached the scene out of curiosity and attempted to assist Wilfredo by calling for transport to the hospital. To support their defense, they presented Aniceta Dosil, who claimed to have arrived after the incident and provided hearsay evidence regarding the conflict.
Trial Court's Findings
The RTC found substantial evidence corroborating Rachel's testimony, assessing her credibility despite her young age and limited education. The court held that the interaction of the accused with the victim indicated conspiracy to commit murder, reinforcing the finding of treachery based on the unexpected and unprovoked attack on Wilfredo.
Appeals and Legal Reasoning
On appeal, Edwin and Alfredo assigned three errors, primarily challenging the credibility of Rachel's testimony and insisting that their guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellate court upheld the RTC's determination, emphasizing the weight of the trial judge's assessment of witness credibility. It stressed that the trial court had the direct opportunity to observe the demeanor and candor of the witnesses, particularly Rachel.
Aggravating Circumstance
The determination of treachery was pivotal in the court's findings, as it denoted the manner of the attack—swift, sudden, and without any provocation afforded to the victim. The evidence illustrated that Wilfredo was defenseless, having his back turned while engaging in a private act, which signified the malicious intent of the accused.
Damages Awarded
The RTC’s judgment included substantial damages for civil indemnity, temperate damages, moral damages, and exemplary damages. Notably, the court emphasized the necessity for com
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 197813)
Case Overview
- The case is an appeal from the Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CR-H.C. No. 04051, affirming the conviction of accused-appellants Edwin Ibañez y Albante and Alfredo Nulla y Ibañez for the crime of Murder as defined under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code.
- The incident occurred on August 29, 2004, in Bocaue, Bulacan, leading to the death of Wilfredo Atendido y Dohenog.
- The appellants were sentenced to reclusion perpetua and ordered to pay damages to the heirs of the victim.
Facts of the Case
- The accused, along with Jesus Monsillo y Taniares (who was not apprehended), were charged with murdering Wilfredo Atendido.
- Wilfredo's death was described as premeditated and executed with evident treachery and abuse of superior strength.
- The prosecution's case was supported by the eyewitness testimony of Wilfredo's 10-year-old daughter, Rachel.
- On the day of the incident, Wilfredo was invited to a drinking session by Alfredo, where he was later attacked by Edwin and Alfredo while being restrained by Edwin and assaulted by Jesus with a long iron bar.
Eyewitness Testimony
- Rachel testified that she witnessed the attack from a nearby location, describing how Edwin covered her father's head with a t-shirt, after which he was struck by Jesus with an iron bar.
- The testimony was characterized by its clarity and detail, despite Rachel's young age