Title
People vs. Guillermo y Garcia
Case
G.R. No. 147786
Decision Date
Jan 20, 2004
Eric Guillermo, accused of murdering and dismembering his employer, initially pleaded guilty but later retracted. Forensic evidence, witness testimony, and media admissions proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Death penalty reduced to reclusion perpetua; damages awarded.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 147786)

Factual Background

Keyser Plastics shared premises with Greatmore Corporation, separated by a partial hollow-block and partial lauanit wall containing viewing holes. On March 22, 1998, security guard Romualdo Campos observed respondent and later heard loud noises. At noon, respondent appeared through a hole, calmly declared he had killed Keyser, and sought help to dispose of the body.

Arrest and Crime-Scene Evidence

Police secured entry keys from respondent, who surrendered without resistance. Officers found Keyser’s dismembered torso, limbs in boxes, and head in a cement bag. Respondent admitted bashing Keyser’s head with wood and sawing the corpse, then handed over a bloodstained piece of coconut lumber and a saw. Crime-scene photographs were taken.

Medical and Forensic Findings

NBI medico-legal officer Dr. Ravell R. Baluyot autopsied the remains, noting thirteen head contusions caused by a blunt object and irregular tissue edges indicating sawing. He could not exclude the possibility the victim was alive during mutilation. PNP pathologist Dr. Olga Bausa confirmed human blood on the recovered implements.

Extrajudicial Admissions and Media Interviews

Respondent gave two televised interviews to ABS-CBN and GMA reporters, voluntarily admitting the crime, describing how he struck and dismembered Keyser, and citing maltreatment and unpaid wages as motive. He expressed no remorse on camera.

Defense Version and Court’s Assessment

Respondent denied culpability, alleging police frame-up and coercion, claiming he was handcuffed by armed individuals, forced to confess, and coached before media interviews. The trial court found his story unworthy of belief and credited the prosecution’s evidence.

Admissibility of Custodial Confession

The court held respondent’s confession at the police station inadmissible under Art. III, Sec. 12 of the 1987 Constitution, as no written waiver or counsel was provided and the posted rights were read but not effectively communicated.

Spontaneous Statements as Res Gestae

The Supreme Court ruled that respondent’s immediate admission to security guard Campos and voluntary media confessions were spontaneous, not elicited by police interrogation, and thus admissible as part of the res gestae exception to the hearsay rule.

Qualification of the Offense: Treachery and Premeditation

The element of treachery was not proven beyond reasonable doubt because no eyewitness established that Keyser had no chance to defend himself or that respondent deliberately adopted a method ensuring no defense. Evident premeditation was likewise not sufficiently shown.

Outraging the Corpse as Qualifying Circumstance

The dismemberment of Keyser’s corpse constituted “outraging or scoffing at the corpse” under RPC Art. 248

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.