Title
People vs. Guiagui y Koteng
Case
G.R. No. 78527
Decision Date
Apr 25, 1990
John Guiagui, arrested in a 1985 buy-bust operation for selling marijuana, claimed coercion; Supreme Court upheld entrapment, modified penalty to life imprisonment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 78527)

Facts of the Case

On November 4, 1985, a confidential informant alerted NARCOM about a notorious drug pusher named Johnny from Baguio City, who was in Manila seeking a buyer for marijuana. M/Sgt. Arsenio Carlos of NARCOM was tasked with conducting an intelligence operation and agreed to pose as the buyer. During an arranged meeting at the Uniwide Sales Center in Cubao, Quezon City, M/Sgt. Carlos expressed his interest in purchasing three kilograms of marijuana, establishing a plan for a subsequent transaction.

On November 9, 1985, M/Sgt. Carlos and a backup team arrived at the prearranged location. When Johnny arrived with a traveling bag containing marijuana, M/Sgt. Carlos confirmed the contents and signaled the backup team to arrest him. A receipt for the sequestered items was prepared and signed by both parties involved. The marijuana was sent for laboratory examination, confirming its identity.

Defense Argument

John Guiagui admitted to being arrested on November 9, 1985, but denied ownership of the bag and its contents. His defense claimed that he was in the restaurant for recreational purposes and that the arrest was unwarranted. Guiagui argued that NARCOM agents had assaulted him and coerced a confession, casting doubt on the legality of his arrest and the evidence presented against him.

Prosecution's Case

The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of NARCOM officers M/Sgt. Carlos and P/Lt. Casimiro Llanes, who provided consistent details about the operation and the accused's participation. They asserted that the operation was a lawful entrapment rather than instigation, wherein the accused was already involved in drug trade activities.

Legal Analysis of Entrapment vs. Instigation

The court highlighted the legal distinction between entrapment and instigation. Entrapment involves law enforcement’s efforts to catch a defendant in the act of a crime, while instigation entails the law enforcement actively persuading or inducing a person to commit an offense they would not have otherwise committed. In this case, the court found that entrapment was evident since the accused was already engaged in illegal drug transactions prior to NARCOM's involvement.

Court's Ruling

The court concluded that the conviction should be upheld because Guiagui had not successfully demonstrated that he was in

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.