Title
People vs. Gelaver
Case
G.R. No. 95357
Decision Date
Jun 9, 1993
Eduardo Gelaver killed his wife, claiming infidelity; court found him guilty of parricide, rejecting exceptional circumstances and mitigating factors.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 95357)

Nature of the Charges

Eduardo Gelaver was charged under Article 246 of the Revised Penal Code for the crime of parricide, which constitutes the unlawful killing of a spouse. The Information asserted that Gelaver attacked Victoria with the intent to kill, resulting in her immediate death from multiple stab wounds.

Eyewitness Testimony

Randy Mamon, an eyewitness, testified that he witnessed a violent altercation between Gelaver and Victoria, where Gelaver grabbed her by the neck and stabbed her three times in the breast with a knife. Mamon's account provided critical evidence of Gelaver's actions and intent at the time of the incident.

The Accused’s Defense

Gelaver admitted to the killing but claimed it was prompted by discovering his wife in a sexual act with her paramour. He characterized the act as one driven by overwhelming passion and described his mental state at the time as dimmed, suggesting that he was not in full control of his faculties.

The Legal Framework

For Gelaver to invoke the provision under Article 247 of the Revised Penal Code, several critical elements must be established. These include the requirement that he must have surprised his spouse in the act of infidelity and not have facilitated her adulterous behavior. The court examined these requirements in detail.

Assessment of Credibility

The court found inconsistencies in Gelaver's testimony which undermined his credibility. Notably, his failure to report the incident immediately to authorities was seen as a lack of a credible defense. His contradictory statements raised doubts as to his version of events, particularly the timing and circumstances surrounding the killing.

Mitigating Circumstances

While the trial court recognized the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender, it incorrectly applied the mitigating effect of passion or obfuscation. The court noted that the emotional distress caused by his wife's abandonment for almo

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.