Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Gamboa
Case
G.R. No. 135382
Decision Date
Sep 29, 2000
Accused Lourdes Gamboa and others illegally recruited individuals for overseas jobs, collected fees, and failed to deploy anyone, leading to her conviction for large-scale illegal recruitment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 135382)

Timeline of Recruitment Activities

From March 1996 to August 1997, the accused operated an illegal recruitment agency from their office located at Ermita Building, Arquiza St., Ermita, Manila. They made promises of overseas employment for various individuals including Marissa Balina, Anna Marie Pili, Romulo Macaraeg, Ernesto Magadan, Domingo Magadan Jr., Roger Castro, and Nemia Beri, in exchange for various fees. Despite these assurances, none of the complainants were deployed for overseas employment, nor were they able to recoup their payments.

Entrapment Operation

On August 15, 1997, a police operation was organized to apprehend the accused. PNP Senior Inspector Ligaya Cabal, posing as a job applicant, went to the accused's office. Upon engaging with Gamboa, she was instructed to fill out application forms and was asked to pay an initial fee of P1,500. Gamboa required this payment in exchange for supposed job placements, which led to her arrest during the operation.

Legal Findings and Conviction

Lourdes Gamboa was indicted and later convicted by the Regional Trial Court for Illegal Recruitment in Large Scale under Republic Act No. 8042. The trial court determined that there was clear and convincing evidence of conspiracy among the accused and that Gamboa actively participated in the recruitment process. The court emphasized that Gamboa's denial could not outweigh the testimony of the complainants.

Elements of Illegal Recruitment

The law defines illegal recruitment broadly, focusing on actions taken by a person who lacks the necessary license or authority to engage in recruitment and placement activities. The prosecution established that Gamboa did not possess the requisite license, thereby satisfying the primary elements of illegal recruitment, especially considering that the recruitment involved multiple victims.

Conspiracy and Participation

The trial court found that each accused played a distinct role in the operation, indicating a conspiracy to defraud job seekers. Testimonies from various complainants highlighted Gamboa's active role in recruiting and aiding applicants in navigating the application process. Despite her assertion that she was merely an applicant herself, evidence showed she was directly involved in the recruitment activities.

Criminal Intent and Defense

The defense argued that Gamboa did not explicitly represent her capability to send individuals abroad for emplo

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.