Title
Source: Supreme Court
People vs. Galvez y Jerez
Case
G.R. No. 136867-68
Decision Date
Sep 24, 2001
A father repeatedly raped his teenage daughter while her mother was away, resulting in pregnancy. DNA confirmed paternity, leading to his conviction and life imprisonment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 136867-68)

Charges and Judicial Proceedings

Rodrigo Galvez was charged with two counts of rape committed on April 30, 1993, and June 30, 1994. The informations, filed against him, stated that he forcibly had carnal knowledge of his 14-year-old daughter, Venus, against her will. Upon arraignment, Galvez entered a plea of "not guilty." The trial proceeded with both cases being heard jointly, culminating in a ruling by the Regional Trial Court that found him guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the charges and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua for the first count and the death penalty for the second.

Arguments of the Accused-Appellant

On automatic review, the accused-appellant raised several defenses:

  1. The trial court erred in conviction, asserting that the prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
  2. The accused-appellant’s alibi was not given due consideration, claiming he was with his family at the hospital during both incidents.

Prosecution's Case

The prosecution laid out a detailed account narrated by Venus, asserting that she lived in a one-room house with her father and brothers while her mother worked in Manila. According to her testimony, on the night of April 30, 1993, after being awakened by her father, she was forcibly assaulted. She also recounted a similar assault on June 30, 1994, while her mother was absent, highlighting threats made against her to deter her from reporting the incidents.

Medical Evidence and Testimonies

Medical examinations conducted by Dr. Marcelito Abas indicated multiple healed lacerations of the hymen, confirming sexual abuse. Venus became pregnant as a result of these assaults, which she disclosed to her mother, leading to the filing of a police complaint.

Credibility of the Victim

The court emphasized that the victim's account was credible and corroborated by medical evidence. The unique circumstances surrounding the incidents, along with the inherent challenges and stigma of testifying against a family member, bolstered the reliability of her testimony. The court asserted that both the intrinsic nature of rape and the vulnerability of the victim, a minor, were critical factors in considering the validity of her claims.

Accused-Appellant's Defense

Galvez's defense rested largely on alibi, claiming that he was at the hospital during the assaults. However, the court recognized the intrinsic weaknesses of alibi as a defense, especially when it lacks corroborative evidence. It underscored that a mere denial cannot outweigh the substantive evidence provided by the victim.

Determination of Guilt and Sentencing

The court upheld the trial court's finding of guilt regarding both counts of rape. It noted the significance of proving both the circumstances of minority and the relationship between the victim and the offender to

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.