Title
People vs. Galas
Case
G.R. No. 139413-15
Decision Date
Mar 20, 2001
A father pleaded guilty to raping his 15-year-old daughter; the Supreme Court reduced his death penalty to reclusion perpetua due to insufficient proof of the victim's age.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 139413-15)

Nature of Charges

The allegations included that Endrico, through force and intimidation, engaged in sexual intercourse with Sharon without her consent. The formal charges were expressed in three criminal cases, specifically identifying the dates of the incidents and the circumstances of the alleged rapes.

Proceedings and Plea

Upon arraignment on April 28, 1998, Endrico pleaded not guilty. However, on May 7, 1999, he sought to change his plea to guilty for Criminal Case No. 0334, concerning the February 28, 1997, incident. This change of plea was accepted after being reiterated at a hearing on June 3, 1999, where he was re-arraigned and subsequently declared guilty.

Testimony of the Victim

Sharon provided detailed testimony about the incidents, particularly regarding the February 28, 1997, event where she described being coerced into undressing and being raped by her father. Her testimony was corroborated by medical evidence, which indicated physical signs of sexual assault.

Decision of the Trial Court

The trial court found Endrico guilty beyond reasonable doubt in Criminal Case No. 0334 and sentenced him to death, while dismissing the other two cases. The court also ordered monetary indemnity to Sharon, amounting to P100,000. This included damages categorized as indemnity and moral/exemplary damages.

Defense and Argument by Accused-Appellant

In his appeal, Endrico contended that his guilty plea was improvidently made and that he did not fully understand the implications, particularly that a guilty plea could result in the death penalty. He argued that the prosecution also failed to conclusively prove Sharon's age at the time of the crimes, which is a crucial element in applying the death penalty under existing laws.

Evaluation of the Plea

The Supreme Court echoed the appellant's concerns, noting that the record did not sufficiently demonstrate that Endrico had been comprehensively informed about the potential consequences of his plea. The Court stated that it is obligatory for trial courts to ensure that accused individuals fully comprehend the ramifications of a guilty plea, particularly for serious offenses that carry the death penalty.

Findings on Victim's Age

The Court emphasized that definitive proof of the victim's age is essential under Republic Act No. 7659 for establishing eligibility for the death penalty. Sharon's testimony regarding her age was deemed insufficient as the only evidence pertaining to her age. The prosecution or any party must present valid documentation to affirm age claims when faced with serious a

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.