Title
People vs. Gahi
Case
G.R. No. 202976
Decision Date
Feb 19, 2014
Mervin Gahi convicted of raping his niece twice; Supreme Court upheld verdict, citing credible victim testimony, rejecting alibi and sweetheart defense. Penalties adjusted.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 202976)

Case Background

This case involves an appeal by the accused, Mervin Gahi, from a decision of the Court of Appeals which upheld his conviction for two counts of rape, as determined by the Regional Trial Court in Criminal Case Nos. 4202 and 4203. The incidents occurred on March 11 and March 12, 2002, in the Municipality of Capoocan, Leyte. The trial court sentenced Gahi to death, which was subsequently reduced to reclusion perpetua by the appellate court.

Allegations and Testimony of the Victim

AAA testified that on both occasions, Gahi used a knife to intimidate her into submission. The first instance occurred at her grandmother's house while the second happened in a footpath near her grandmother’s home. In her account, both times Gahi threatened her, physically overpowered her, and ultimately raped her. Despite her immediate fear and helplessness, she did not report the incidents out of fear for her life and that of her family. It was only when AAA became pregnant that she confided in a friend and subsequently filed a police report.

Defense Argument and Testimony

Gahi denied the allegations, providing an alibi supported by witnesses who claimed he was working at a nearby copra dryer during the times of the alleged incidents. The defense argued inconsistencies in AAA’s testimony, asserting that her claims were not credible. They also pointed to the existence of another potential father for the child, claiming that AAA had been in a relationship with Jackie Gucela.

Court Findings on Credibility

The courts emphasized that a victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction in rape cases if it is credible and coherent. The appellate court found AAA's account to be clear and consistent regarding the use of intimidation and violence by Gahi. The testimony's credibility was bolstered by AAA’s age and lack of any ill motive.

Rejection of Defense Claims

The court noted that Gahi’s alibi was weak and not corroborated adequately, allowing for the possibility of him being present at the crime scene. The courts ruled that deviations in testimony regarding minor details do not undermine the overall credibility of the primary allegations.

Sentencing and Modifications

The initial death penalty imposed was found to be inappropriate given

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.