Title
People vs. Francisco
Case
G.R. No. 21390
Decision Date
Mar 26, 1924
A sanitary inspector intimidated a store owner into paying ₱2 under threat of prosecution, leading to a Supreme Court ruling that the act constituted robbery, not bribery, due to coercion.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 142961)

Background of the Offense

On the inspection date, Francisco discovered lard with a blackish substance that he judged to be unfit for consumption. According to the accusation, he threatened Sy Ham, the store owner, with criminal prosecution unless Ham paid him two pesos. Fearing legal repercussions involving potential fines, Ham ultimately succumbed to Francisco’s demands after a series of negotiations. Initially offered one peso and later two pesos, the transaction concluded with Ham making the payment under duress.

Subsequent Actions and Legal Complaint

Three days after the initial payment, Francisco revisited the store and reprimanded Sy Ham for allegedly spreading word of the incident. On August 11, he returned with a policeman, during which he allegedly tampered with the lard by introducing cigarette ashes and subsequently lodged a complaint against Ham for violations related to public health regulations. Ham maintained that he had cleaned his store in anticipation of trouble following Francisco's prior visit.

Legal Determination of Offense

The crux of the case is to determine whether Francisco’s actions constituted bribery or robbery as defined within the Philippine Penal Code. The previous decisions of the court outlined important distinctions between the two offenses. Bribery involves a mutual and voluntary transaction, while robbery, defined under article 503, involves obtaining property through force or intimidation.

Court's Analysis and Conclusion

In this case, the court found clarity in the nature of the transaction. The payment made by Sy Ham was not voluntary but was coerced through threats of prosecution by Francisco. Therefore, t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.