Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Fortich
Case
G.R. No. 80399-404
Decision Date
Nov 13, 1997
Accused abducted, raped, and robbed victims in Cagayan de Oro; denied charges, claiming consent and coercion. Supreme Court upheld conviction, modified penalties.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 80399-404)

Applicable Law

The case is primarily governed by provisions of the Revised Penal Code, particularly Articles 342 and 335 related to forcible abduction and rape, respectively, along with Article 294 concerning robbery.

Summary of Events

On the evening of March 31, 1983, after attending mass, the Nobleza sisters, along with their companions, were confronted by the accused who were armed with handguns. The sisters were ordered into a vehicle and subjected to physical violence and intimidation. The accused abducted the sisters, taking them to a remote area where they were sexually assaulted. The incident involved robbery as both male companions were also victims of violence and theft during the abduction.

Evidence Presented

The prosecution's case relied on the testimonies of the victims and medical experts. Victims Marilou and Maritess testified about the violence used against them, detailing how they were threatened and sexually assaulted. Medical examinations corroborated their accounts, revealing physical injuries consistent with rape and other assaults. The defense, on the other hand, presented contradictory versions that the court found implausible, arguing that the sisters were somehow willing participants.

Pre-Trial and Trial Proceedings

Upon arraignment, both accused pled not guilty to all charges. The trial involved the consolidation of six criminal cases for joint hearing. The prosecution presented a coherent narrative based on victim testimonies and physical evidence, while the defense focused on denial and claims of alternative scenarios, which were not substantiated by credible evidence.

Trial Court's Findings

The trial court found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt for various offenses, including forcible abduction with rape. Based on the evidence, the court concluded that the acts of Fortich and Gaid were premeditated, executed in concert, and indicative of a clear intent to commit the crimes.

Sentencing

The trial court imposed severe penalties upon the accused, including reclusion perpetua for forcible abduction with rape and varying terms of imprisonment for robbery. The court also ordered the payment of moral and actual damages to the victims, emphasizing the grievous nature of the offenses committed.

Appeal and Legal Arguments

In their appeal, the accused raised issues concerning the admissibility of an extrajudicial confession and the sufficiency of the evidence. The appellate court held that the confession was admissible as it complied with the laws in effect at the time and reiterated that the prosecution met the burden of proof necessary for conviction.

Ruling of the Appellate Court

The appellate court affirmed the tr

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.