Title
People vs. Florida y Cepeda
Case
G.R. No. 90254
Decision Date
Sep 24, 1992
TSgt. Paquito Ravelo was shot dead in 1988; Carlos Florida was convicted of murder despite his alibi, as eyewitness testimony and treachery were proven. The Supreme Court upheld the ruling, increasing indemnity to P50,000.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 161110)

Applicable Law

The legal basis for the proceedings is rooted in the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines, particularly Article 248 concerning murder. The decision is also guided by the provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution due to the case's decision date in 1992.

Case Background

On the night of February 13, 1988, T/Sgt. Ravelo was shot and killed. Witnesses, including Tito Villanueva, identified Carlos Florida and Bernardino Galvante as the assailants. An Information was formally filed against Florida on March 16, 1988, charging him with murder, which he pleaded not guilty to during his arraignment on March 29, 1988. The trial measured the testimonies from prosecution and defense witnesses, culminating in a conviction in July 1989.

Prosecution's Evidence

The prosecution's case was supported by eyewitness accounts, medical testimony, and a thorough examination of the crime scene. Multiple witnesses testified to seeing Florida shoot Ravelo following an initial shot fired by Galvante. Medical evidence indicated that Ravelo sustained four gunshot wounds, leading to his death. Furthermore, familial and social disputes between Ravelo and Galvante provided a motive for the murder.

Defense's Case

Florida's defense relied heavily on an alibi, claiming he was at the home of Isauro Floriano during the time of the shooting. However, this alibi was contradicted by witness testimonies that placed him at the crime scene. Other defense witnesses attempted to provide support for Florida's claims, but the trial court found their testimonies lacking in credibility.

Trial Court's Decision

The trial court convicted Florida, citing clear evidence of murder characterized by treachery, evident premeditation, and conspiracy between him and Galvante. The court imposed a sentence of reclusion perpetua and ordered indemnity to the victim's heirs. The motion for reconsideration filed by Florida was later denied.

Appeal and Legal Analysis

Upon appeal, Florida contended errors in the trial court's assessment of witness credibilities and the conviction based on insufficient evidence. The appellate court found no reason to overturn the trial court's decision, emphasizing that the credibility of witnesses is best assessed by the original trial court. It dismissed Florida's arguments regarding the testimony of an alibi as u

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.