Title
People vs. Flores
Case
G.R. No. 71980
Decision Date
Mar 18, 1991
Four men conspired to rape, kill, and rob a nurse in 1984. Convicted based on credible testimony, physical evidence, and proven conspiracy, their death sentences were modified to reclusion perpetua after the abolition of the death penalty.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 71980)

Details of the Crimes

Mercedes Dulay was attacked and killed by the defendants who, with intent to rape and kill, took turns assaulting her and subsequently caused her death through multiple stab wounds and other severe injuries. The heinousness of the crime extended to the subsequent desecration of the victim's body, including the insertion of a branch into her vaginal canal and the stealing of items, such as a gold ring and a wristwatch. The defendants acted in conspiracy and demonstrated premeditation, as evidenced by their prior planning and coordination of the attack.

Proceedings and Initial Confessions

Leonardo Flores initially pleaded guilty during the arraignment; however, the court chose to record a plea of not guilty to allow him the opportunity to engage counsel. Eventually, he reaffirmed his guilty plea and later testified extensively against his co-defendants, outlining their actions before and during the crime—including their collective plan to assault Mercedes and the details of the subsequent rape and murder.

Testimonies and Evidence

Flores testified that he and the other defendants consumed alcohol and drugs before agreeing to commit the crime, demonstrating a degree of planning and deliberation. After the murder, they attempted to conceal their act by disposing of the victim’s body in a nearby canal and stealing her possessions. Forensic evidence, including the autopsy results, confirmed the victim sustained numerous fatal injuries and was raped, further establishing the claims made during the trial about the brutality of the crimes.

Verdict and Sentencing

The Regional Trial Court found all four defendants guilty of the special complex crime of multiple rape with homicide. Given the aggravating circumstances and the confirmed conspiracy, the court initially imposed a death penalty for each defendant. However, as the case progressed into the 1990s and in light of the newly enacted 1987 Philippine Constitution, which abolished the death penalty, the punishment was reconsidered and converted to reclusion perpetua instead.

Appeals and Legal Arguments

The defendants Cruz, Parinas, and Sarsoza appealed the court's decision, arguing several deficiencies in the evidence, particularly challenging the credibility of Flores' testimony and the court's reliance on his confession. The court acknowledged the concerns regarding confessions but defended the reliability of Flores' judicial confession based on his demeanor and the consistency of details provided when recounting the events of the crime.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the appellate court

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.