Title
People vs. Ferdez
Case
G.R. No. L-32623
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1972
Enrique Fernandez pleaded guilty to robbery with frustrated homicide and multiple homicide. The Supreme Court reduced his death penalty to reclusion perpetua, citing the mitigating plea of guilty and absence of aggravating circumstances.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-32623)

Charges and Allegations

The information presented against Fernandez and his co-defendants claims they committed theft of PHP 350.00 from Sebastian Espelita, Sr., utilizing force and violence. The defendants are also accused of attacking Sebastian Espelita, Jr., leading to a wounded chest injury, as well as assaulting and fatally wounding four others, including pregnant Dolores Espelita. The Commission of this crime took place during nighttime, denoted in the information.

Plea and Trial Court Judgment

Upon arraignment, Fernandez, represented by court-appointed counsel, pleaded guilty after being informed about the charge's significance and the potential penalty. The trial court subsequently determined that the crime constituted “Robbery with Frustrated Homicide and Multiple Homicide," under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code, carrying a penalty ranging from reclusion perpetua to death. The court acknowledged Fernandez's guilty plea as a mitigating circumstance and sentenced him to the death penalty along with an indemnification of PHP 12,000 to the heirs of each deceased victim.

Review of Sentencing

The appeal presented by Attorney Honorio Poblador, Jr., appointed for this review, questioned the appropriateness of the death penalty given the mitigating circumstance of the guilty plea and no identified aggravating circumstances. While the trial court mentioned that the crime was committed at night, the appeal argued that this circumstance did not fulfill the requirements to qualify as an aggravating factor under Article 14(6) of the Revised Penal Code, which stipulates that nocturnity must enhance the likelihood of success or facilitate the crime.

Judicial Findings on Nocturnity

The court noted that the mere mention of the crime's occurrence at night did not satisfy the criteria necessary to consider it an aggravating circumstance. Additionally, if nocturnity were regarded as aggravating, it would offset the mitigating circumstance of the guilty plea. Article 63(2) of the Revised Penal Code provide

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.