Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Fabro y Azucena
Case
G.R. No. 114261
Decision Date
Feb 10, 2000
Appellant convicted for selling 1kg marijuana in a buy-bust operation; conspiracy with accomplice established; marked money absence deemed irrelevant.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 114261)

Charges and Court Proceedings

The appellant, along with Donald Pilay and Irene Martin, was accused of violating Section 21(b) of Article IV in relation to Section 4, Article II of Republic Act No. 6425, as amended. The charge pertained to the unauthorized sale and/or delivery of marijuana, specifically one kilo of dried marijuana leaves, on April 7, 1993. The prosecution argued that the three conspired to sell the prohibited drug to an undercover police officer, leading to the arrest of the appellant and her co-accused.

Prosecution's Case Overview

The case initiated when two informants reported to Chief Inspector Evasco that a couple in Quirino Hill, Baguio City, was selling marijuana. Subsequently, a buy-bust operation was organized, during which the poseur-buyer, PO2 Apduhan, was given P600 to purchase marijuana. Upon arrival at the location, Apduhan was introduced to the appellant as a buyer. The appellant negotiated a price of P600 and later produced a package with marijuana, which was handed over to Apduhan. A signal prompted law enforcement to execute the arrest; while Irene Martin attempted to flee, the appellant and Donald Pilay were apprehended.

Defense's Argument

The defense contended that the appellant did not engage in the sale of marijuana and claimed that the two informants, Gloria and Emma, were the ones carrying the illegal substance. Appellant asserted she was at home cooking and denied interacting with the individuals during the supposed drug transaction. The defense pointed out discrepancies in the weight of the marijuana, with a forensic chemist indicating it weighed only 99.5 grams during a later examination, contrary to the prosecution's claim of one kilo.

Trial Court's Decision

On January 4, 1994, the trial court found Berly Fabro guilty of selling marijuana and sentenced her to life imprisonment and a fine of P20,000. The court ordered the confiscated marijuana to be forfeited to the state for destruction. Donald Pilay was acquitted due to insufficient evidence proving his guilt, while Irene Martin remained at large with an alias warrant issued for her arrest.

Appeal and Rationale

In her appeal, the appellant maintained that her guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt and invoked three main arguments: the discrepancy in the weight of the seized marijuana, the absence of the marked money used in the transaction, and the allegation that Irene Martin was the real perpetrator. The court found these grounds unpersuasive. The weight of evidence substantiated that the marijuana indeed weighed one kilogram at the time of seizure, significantly supported by forensic reports. Furthermore, while the marked money was not recovered, it was established that its absence did not undermine the prosecution’s case since t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.