Title
People vs. Evangelista
Case
G.R. No. 175281
Decision Date
Sep 27, 2007
Two men convicted for selling 974.12g of shabu in a buy-bust operation; alibi and frame-up defenses dismissed; conviction upheld by Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 102310-12)

Procedural Background and Charges

On December 15, 2000, both Reyes and Evangelista were charged with the illegal sale of 974.12 grams of methylamphetamine hydrochloride. The prosecution’s principal evidence stemmed from a buy-bust operation conducted by Philippine National Police officers, led by Lt. Joy Anrade, and SPO2 Celestino Dela Cruz as the poseur-buyer. Following arraignment, both accused pleaded not guilty, leading to a trial where the prosecution relied solely on the testimony of SPO2 Dela Cruz.

Evidence Presented by the Prosecution

The prosecution's evidence indicated that on December 13, 2000, a female informant alerted the Narcotics Group about the sale of one kilogram of shabu by Evangelista and Reyes. The buy-bust operation commenced with the police preparing buy-bust money marked by initial identifiers. The police executed their operation at the Shell Gasoline Station in Quezon City, where transactions took place, leading to the arrest of both accused shortly after they received the buy-bust money in exchange for illegal drugs.

Defense Arguments

In their defense, Reyes and Evangelista asserted claims of denial and alibi, alleging that they did not know each other prior to their arrests and were framed. Reyes claimed he was waiting in a hotel room for a friend when he was apprehended, while Evangelista stated he was dining nearby when he was approached and arrested by police. The defense also presented a night manager of the hotel to corroborate Reyes' alibi, who testified to the absence of any related activity in the hotel's logbooks.

Assessment of Defense Credibility

The RTC found both defenses unconvincing, highlighting the lack of credible evidence to support alibis. The night manager's testimony corroborated the prosecution’s timeline, leading the court to determine that both defendants were likely lying to exculpate themselves. The discrepancies in their testimonies and the implausibility of their alibi, especially considering the details surrounding their supposed meeting, undermined their credibility.

Court's Findings on Entrapment and Buy-Bust Validity

The crux of the case rested upon the legality of the buy-bust operation. The Supreme Court upheld the findings that the operation followed the proper protocol and that SPO2 Dela Cruz provided a coherent account of the transaction, thus satisfying the objective test established in precedent. This test mandates that detailed

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.