Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Eda y Casani
Case
G.R. No. 220715
Decision Date
Aug 24, 2016
Ronnie Boy Eda convicted for illegal sale and possession of shabu after a buy-bust operation; defense of frame-up dismissed, chain of custody upheld.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 220715)

Case Background and Charges

On February 18, 2011, two informations were filed against Eda. In Criminal Case No. 6604, he was charged with illegal possession of shabu, specifically alleging that on February 17, 2011, he unlawfully had in his possession four heat-sealed plastic sachets containing a total of 0.08 grams of methamphetamine. In Criminal Case No. 6605, he was charged with selling one heat-sealed plastic sachet of shabu weighing 0.02 grams. Eda entered a plea of "Not Guilty" during his arraignment, leading to a trial while he remained in detention.

Prosecution Evidence

The prosecution's case was primarily supported by the testimonies of police officers involved in the buy-bust operation. On the day in question, PO2 Roman De Chavez Bejer received information from a civilian informant alleging that Eda was selling shabu. A buy-bust team was quickly assembled, and by 5:00 PM, Eda was apprehended during the operation in Barangay Caloocan. During the interaction, PO2 Bejer witnessed Eda exchange the plastic sachet for the marked purchase money. Following the arrest, additional sachets of shabu were discovered in Eda's possession.

The police duly conducted a physical inventory of the seized items, which was witnessed by officials from the Department of Justice and the barangay. The specimens were sent for laboratory testing, which confirmed the presence of methamphetamine.

Defense Evidence

In defense, Eda denied the charges, asserting that he did not sell or use drugs. He claimed that he had been drinking with his relatives during the relevant timeframe and was wrongfully accused and assaulted by police officers. He argued that the drugs recovered were planted. However, Eda failed to provide concrete evidence to substantiate his claims or demonstrate why he was targeted by law enforcement.

RTC's Findings and Ruling

The RTC convicted Eda on September 17, 2013, concluding that the prosecution had proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, all elements necessary for the charges of illegal sale and possession of shabu. It emphasized the credibility of the law enforcement witnesses, the proper conduct of procedures during the buy-bust, and the subsequent handling of the evidence. The court determined that Eda's claims of a set-up were unpersuasive and inadequately supported by evidence, resulting in significant sentences under the law: 12 years and 4 months to 14 years and 6 months of imprisonment in Criminal Case No. 6604 and life imprisonment in Criminal Case No. 6605.

CA's Affirmation of Conviction

Eda’s appeal was dismissed by the CA on December 10, 2014, which upheld the RTC’s findings. The appellate court ruled that discrepancies in the witnesses' testimonies did not weaken the prosecution's case, noting an unbroken chain of custody regarding the seized shabu. It concluded that the essential elements for both transactions—sale and possession—had been sufficientl

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.