Title
People vs. Duenas, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 151286
Decision Date
Mar 31, 2004
Convicted felon acquitted after Supreme Court ruled his extrajudicial confession inadmissible due to coercion, lack of evidence, and constitutional violations.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 151286)

Key Dates

  • November 29, 1996: The murder of Elva Ramos-Jacob takes place.
  • April 1, 1997: Initial information charging DueAas with murder is filed.
  • October 26, 2001: The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Baler, Aurora, convicts DueAas of murder, imposing a death sentence.
  • March 31, 2004: The decision is reviewed by the Supreme Court.

Applicable Law

This case references the 1987 Philippine Constitution, particularly Article III, Section 12, which outlines the rights of individuals under custodial investigation.

Summary of Facts

Catalino DueAas, Jr. was charged with the murder of Elva Ramos-Jacob. He was previously convicted of homicide in 1990 and was serving time in Iwahig Prison Farm when he escaped in 1995. On November 29, 1996, witnesses reported hearing gunshots, and DueAas was subsequently implicated in the murder after he was apprehended by police on December 18, 1996, following an unrelated incident.

The Confession and Legal Proceedings

During custodial investigation, DueAas confessed to the murder, asserting he was commissioned by another individual, Benny Poblete. His confession was written down and signed in the presence of a lawyer, Atty. Josefina S. Angara. However, DueAas later claimed that he was coerced into confessing due to physical abuse by police, which he denied discussing with his lawyer at the time.

Trial Court's Ruling

The RTC convicted DueAas based largely on his extrajudicial confession, finding it voluntarily given despite his claims of coercion. He was sentenced to death, and the decision emphasized his admission of guilt and the consistency of details in his confession as indicative of its voluntariness.

Appeal and Arguments

DueAas filed an automatic appeal, arguing that his confession was obtained through force and intimidation, violating his constitutional rights. The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) acknowledged the potential involuntariness of the confession and supported DueAas's argument for acquittal.

Supreme Court's Analysis

The Supreme Court determined that the extrajudicial confession was inadmissible. The Court highlighted violations of DueAas's rights under the 1987 Constitution, particularly

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.