Title
People vs. Diva
Case
G.R. No. L-22946
Decision Date
Apr 29, 1968
Maximo Diva, convicted of homicide, claimed self-defense in the fatal bolo attack on Ananias Bano during a land dispute. Cesaria Diva acquitted; evident premeditation unproven, voluntary surrender mitigated Maximo's sentence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-22946)

Allegations and Incident Details

The prosecution alleged that on the incident date, both accused conspired to kill Ananias Bano using bolos, inflicting eight wounds, two of which were fatal. Following a pilgrimage to a local chapel, Bano and his common-law wife were suddenly attacked by the Divas. Maximo confronted Bano with a bolo, while Cesaria attacked from behind. The evidence indicated that Bano, despite retreating and defending himself, sustained severe injuries.

Medical Findings and Outcome

According to the autopsy conducted by Dr. Edilberto Olitres, Bano died from fatal wounds to the chest and neck, resulting in hemorrhaging and internal organ damage. Post-attack, the accused fled the scene, with Maximo eventually turning himself in to authorities the following day, suggesting awareness of the legal implications of his actions.

Defense Claims

Maximo Diva admitted to killing Bano but claimed self-defense, asserting that he was ambushed by Bano. Cesaria contended she did not participate in the attack. However, the trial court found their accounts inconsistent and lacking sufficient evidence of self-defense.

Trial Court's Findings

The trial court ultimately found both accused guilty of murder and sentenced them to reclusion perpetua, determining that evident premeditation, treachery, and conspiracy were present in their actions. The court also noted Maximo’s flight as indicative of guilt, notwithstanding his voluntary surrender, viewing it as an act of fleeing rather than compliance.

Appeals and Assignments of Error

On appeal, the Divas challenged multiple facets of the trial court's findings, including the presence of evident premeditation, denial of mitigating circumstances, alleged conspiracy, and the credibility of witness testimony. The appellate court scrutinized these claims, noting that the trial court had effectively assessed the evidence and credibility, leading to an affirmation of guilt for Maximo.

Modification of Judgment

After thorough review, it was concluded that while Maximo was guilty of homicide, the conviction was to be amended to reflect the circumstances of voluntary surrender, lea

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.