Title
People vs. Dio
Case
G.R. No. L-36461
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1984
Crispulo Alega was stabbed during an attempted robbery by Hernando Dio and Danilo Tobias. Dio confessed but claimed coercion. Court ruled attempted robbery with homicide, imposing 10-20 years.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-36461)

Case Background

An information for robbery with homicide was initially filed against Danilo Tobias and an unidentified person (“John Doe”) on October 1, 1971. Following the unsuccessful attempt to arrest Tobias, the information was amended on December 7, 1971, to name Hernando Dio as the co-accused. The charges specifically involved the brutal robbery and murder of civil engineer Crispulo P. Alega in Pasay City on July 24, 1971.

Proceedings and Evidence

During the trial, Hernando Dio pleaded not guilty. The prosecution presented evidence that on the day of the incident, Alega had been attacked while attempting to escort his girlfriend, Remedios Maniti. She testified that Dio and Tobias conspired to rob Alega, during which Alega was attacked, stabbed multiple times, and left to die. The stab wound led to his instantaneous death, as confirmed by the medical examiner.

Additionally, an extrajudicial confession from Dio admitted to his role during the incident. Despite claiming he had no part in the stabbing, he acknowledged holding Alega’s hands while Tobias carried out the act.

Trial Court's Judgment

The trial court found Dio guilty of robbery with homicide under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code, imposing the death penalty along with monetary compensation to Alega's heirs. This judgment was contested by Dio's defense.

Defense Argument

Dio's attorney argued that the robbery was not consummated as the watch was still on Alega's wrist, positing that the offense should be classified as attempted robbery with homicide. The defense maintained that the trial court erred in its conviction and sentencing, asserting there were no aggravating circumstances present to justify the death penalty.

Appeal and Reassessment

Upon review, the Supreme Court considered the prosecution's evidence and agreed with the defense’s argument that no consummated robbery occurred. The killing was deemed incidental, linked to an attempted robbery, thus qualifying for a lesser charge under Article 297 of the Revised Penal Code.

Moreover, the Court concluded that the prosecution failed to demonstrate any aggravatin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.