Title
People vs. Diego
Case
G.R. No. 130397
Decision Date
Jan 17, 2002
Diego and Galvez allegedly conspired to shoot Vinculados during a land dispute, resulting in one death and two near-fatal injuries. Diego claimed self-defense; the Supreme Court upheld his murder conviction, rejecting his defense and modifying damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 130397)

Charges and Proceedings

Diego and Galvez faced charges of murder and double frustrated murder in the Quezon City Regional Trial Court, following a transfer of venue from Malolos after initial charges of homicide were filed. The core accusations stemmed from an event on November 11, 1993, where Diego and Galvez allegedly shot the Vinculado family, resulting in Alvin's death and injuries to Miguel and Levi.

Factual Background

On the day of the incident, Miguel Vinculado, accompanied by his nephews Levi and Alvin, confronted Mayor Galvez about the expropriation of his land for road construction. After a heated exchange, Mayor Galvez drew a gun and attempted to take the Vinculados' cameras. A violent altercation ensued, during which Galvez allegedly shot Miguel, while Diego used a rifle to shoot both Levi and Alvin, resulting in fatal and serious injuries.

Defense Claims

Diego's defense hinged on claims of self-defense and defense of a stranger, arguing that he acted to protect Mayor Galvez and himself from the perceived illegal aggression of the Vinculados, whom he claimed were armed. However, this assertion relied heavily on Diego's interpretation of the events leading up to the shooting, which included no corroborating evidence supporting his claims of imminent danger.

Assessment of Self-Defense

For a self-defense claim to be valid under Philippine law, the accused must prove (1) unlawful aggression from the victim, (2) the means employed to repel such aggression were reasonable, and (3) there must be no provocation from the person defending. The trial court found that Diego's account lacked these elements, concluding that there was no unlawful aggression from the Vinculados and that the alleged weapons (a knife and a revolver) were never recovered.

Court Findings

The trial court determined that the evidence presented did not support Diego's assertions, particularly citing the lack of any physical evidence confirming the presence of the weapons he claimed were used against him. Furthermore, the court highlighted Diego's evasive actions post-event, including fleeing and hiding, as inconsistent with a claim of legitimate self-defense.

Judgment and Sentencing

The trial court found Diego guilty of murder and double frustrated murder, considering the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender. He was sentenced to reclusion pe

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.