Title
People vs. Dela Cruz
Case
G.R. No. 92442-43
Decision Date
Mar 23, 1992
A 15-year-old alleged rape by Nestor de la Cruz in 1988 and 1989; inconsistencies in testimony and lack of credible evidence led to his acquittal by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 92442-43)

Allegations

The two complaints filed on July 26, 1989, allege that Dela Cruz, using a knife for intimidation, sexually assaulted Centeno on the specified dates, against her will and without her consent.

Trial Proceedings

Upon arraignment, Dela Cruz entered a plea of not guilty. The prosecution's version of events was presented through the testimony of the complainant, detailing the incidents of alleged rape, the threats made by Dela Cruz, and the coercive circumstances surrounding both incidents.

Testimonies of the Complainant

Centeno described how Dela Cruz lured her under false pretenses to Mang Romy's house, threatened her with a knife, forced her into submission, and sexually assaulted her. She testified about the fear induced by the threats, which prevented her from reporting the incidents to her parents immediately.

Dela Cruz’s Defense

The accused denied the allegations, asserting no sexual intercourse occurred. He claimed that the locations mentioned were public and had no walls, making it impossible for an assault to go unnoticed. His defense included testimonies from his wife and acquaintances corroborating his claims of being at home with karate students during the incidents.

Trial Court Decisions

The Regional Trial Court found Dela Cruz guilty of both counts of rape, sentencing him to double reclusion perpetua and ordering him to pay damages to the victim. The court relied heavily on the complainant’s testimony, determining it was credible despite the defense’s efforts to challenge it.

Appeal

Dela Cruz appealed the verdict, contending that the trial court erred in finding sufficient evidence to support his conviction. He argued the prosecution's evidence was not credible, asserting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and questioning the circumstances under which the incidents allegedly occurred.

Credibility of the Complainant

The appellate court considered three critical principles relevant to the assessment of rape cases, particularly emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny of the complainant's testimony due to the intrinsic nature of the crime. The court largely reflected on the trial judge's conclusion that the complainant appeared honest and straightforward during her testimony.

Scrutiny of Evidence

On reviewing the evidence, the appellate court noted discrepancies that raised reasonable doubts regarding the complainant’s claims. Key points included:

  • Lack of Immediate Disclosure: The complainant did not report the incidents until much later and only after discussing the matter with friends.
  • Inconsistencies in Testimonies: There were contradictions between the complainant's courtroom testimony and her previous statements, which indicated a lack of reliability.
  • Opportunity to Escape: There were opportunities for the complainant to resist or call for help during the incidents but she did not do so, raising doubts about the al

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.