Title
People vs. De Otero
Case
G.R. No. 28072
Decision Date
Dec 10, 1927
Francisco de Otero instigated the murder of Gerardo Rocha to pursue an affair with Rocha’s wife, hiring accomplices who testified against him; the court upheld his life sentence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 28072)

Relevant Facts

On May 31, 1927, Gerardo Rocha was found unconscious in an abandoned vehicle. Although he was taken to a provincial hospital, he died later that day without speaking. An autopsy indicated foul play. The following day, De Otero, Infante, and Sitchon were arrested as suspects. Infante and Sitchon requested separate trials, with both pleading guilty but having their sentences deferred until after De Otero's trial. De Otero maintained his innocence, pleading not guilty.

Procedural History

De Otero's trial began on June 20, 1927, and concluded the following day with him being found guilty of murder, sentenced to life imprisonment, and ordered to indemnify Rocha's heirs. De Otero appealed the trial court’s judgment, citing four alleged errors: the credibility of Infante's testimony, failure to produce a prior statement by Infante, insufficiency of evidence, and the request for absolution.

Evaluation of Testimony and Credibility

The appellate review centered on the credibility of witnesses, particularly Antonio Infante. Notably, suspect testimonies may serve as a basis for convictions but should, ideally, be corroborated by other evidence. Infante testified that De Otero had orchestrated the murder, motivated by a desire to rekindle a relationship with Rocha’s wife. Infante’s narrative implied that he and Sitchon were persuaded to commit the act under the promise of monetary reward and employment.

Corroborative Evidence

The court found corroborating evidence for Infante's claims, including the motive related to De Otero's interest in Mrs. Rocha and eyewitness accounts that the three were seen together. Importantly, Rocha was found with his belongings, negating robbery as a motive. The court observed that the absence of evidence indicating Infante and Sitchon's independent motive supported their actions being driven by De Otero's instigation.

Rebuttal and Defense Arguments

De Otero's defense denied his involvement, admitting, however, to an affair with Mrs. Rocha. He suggested he was innocent and intended to leave the area at the time of the crime. On appeal, the defense argued that Infante’s testimony was unreliable and stated that minor inconsistencies undermine its veracity.

Judicial Reasoning

The trial court's analysis focused on witness credibility, and the Supreme Court emphasized deference to the trial court's findings unless they are unsupported by the evidence. The court observed that despite minor discrepancies in Infante’s testimony, substantial evidence corroborated the material facts regarding De Otero's culpability.

Legal Classification of the Crime

The crime was identified as murder given the premeditated nature of the killing, with aggravating circumstances established, including evident premeditation and craft. The court ruled out treachery

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.