Title
People vs. De Jesus
Case
G.R. No. L-38309
Decision Date
Oct 23, 1978
A nine-year-old girl, Lualhati Landayan, was raped during a Flores de Mayo procession in 1972. Angelito de Jesus was convicted based on her credible testimony, medical evidence, and his prior confession to a similar crime.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-3629)

Incident Description

On the evening of May 21, 1972, Lualhati was given permission by her mother to attend a religious procession with a neighbor, Josie Garcia. After the procession, Lualhati, feeling tired, was instructed by Josie to sleep on a bench in the chapel while Josie watched the basketball game nearby. Shortly after, Lualhati was reportedly abducted and assaulted in a haystack near the chapel.

Medical Findings and Initial Investigation

Upon awakening, Lualhati found herself being assaulted by a man, whom she later identified as Angelito de Jesus. After the assault, Lualhati returned to the chapel, visibly harmed and with a swollen cheek. Her mother took her to a clinic where medical examination revealed signs of rape, including lacerations and bruises consistent with sexual assault. Subsequent examinations by doctors confirmed these injuries.

Police Investigation

Following a report filed by Lualhati’s mother, police investigations led by Lieutenant Leonardo B. Feliciano began. Witnesses, including a child who saw a man in red pants inside the chapel, identified De Jesus as the suspect. Additional witness accounts and confrontation procedures solidified Lualhati’s identification of De Jesus as the rapist.

Trial Proceedings

The preliminary investigation was held in the municipal court, where evidence was compiled against De Jesus, including testimonies from Lualhati, her mother, and police investigators. Notably, the municipal judge found probable cause for rape and ordered de Jesus' arrest, which was followed by his release on bail.

Defense and Testimony

During trial proceedings, de Jesus maintained his alibi of being at the basketball court during the time of the incident and denied any wrongdoing. He claimed he was wrongly identified and referenced additional suspects who were ruled out during the investigation. His defense testimonies attempted to discredit the gathering evidence against him, citing issues with credibility and procedural errors.

Conviction and Sentencing

The trial court ultimately convicted Angelito de Jesus of rape under Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, sentencing him to life imprisonment and requiring him to indemnify the victim's family P165. The court found Lualhati's testimony credible, corroborated by medical findings and other witnesses.

Appeal and Affirmation of Conviction

In reviewing the appeal, the court emphasized the strength of the prosecution's evidence, including Lualhati’s consistent identification of De Jesus and h

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.