Title
People vs. De Dios
Case
G.R. No. 243664
Decision Date
Jan 22, 2020
Accused-appellant convicted for illegal sale and possession of shabu during a buy-bust operation; chain of custody upheld, defenses of denial and frame-up rejected.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 243664)

Case Background

Accused-appellant Jocel BaAares De Dios was charged with Illegal Sale (Criminal Case No. T-5869) and Illegal Possession (Criminal Case No. T-5870) of Dangerous Drugs, specifically methamphetamine hydrochloride, commonly known as "shabu." The Regional Trial Court of Tabaco City found him guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution's case stemmed from a buy-bust operation conducted on June 5, 2014, where police seized plastic sachets containing shabu from the accused-appellant.

Prosecution's Evidence

During the operation, a poseur-buyer from the Tabaco City Police Station made a successful purchase of shabu from accused-appellant, which was subsequently seized along with additional contraband during a follow-up search. Items were marked, inventoried, and photographed immediately after confiscation, in compliance with legal requirements. The evidence was subjected to a laboratory examination, confirming the substance as a prohibited drug.

Accused-Appellant's Defense

In his defense, the accused-appellant denied the charges, claiming that he was unjustly arrested while waiting for a pedicab. He alleged that the drugs were planted on him by law enforcement officers who were previously acquainted with him due to a prior, unrelated with insufficient evidence. This defense relied heavily on his own testimony, lacking corroborative evidence.

Regional Trial Court's Decision

The Regional Trial Court, in its August 1, 2016 decision, found the accused-appellant guilty of both charges and handed down severe penalties: life imprisonment and a fine of P500,000.00 for the sale of drugs, and a twelve-year and one-day to fourteen-year term with a P300,000.00 fine for possession. The RTC cited the credibility of the prosecution witnesses and the failure of the accused-appellant’s defense, which was deemed self-serving and unsubstantiated.

Court of Appeals Review

The accused-appellant appealed to the Court of Appeals, which upheld the RTC's finding in a decision dated May 23, 2018. The appellate court agreed that the prosecution successfully established all elements of the alleged offenses, reinforcing the findings and interpretations made by the trial court.

The Court's Ruling on Appeal

In affirming the lower courts' decisions, the higher court reiterated that the elements for Illegal Sale and Possession under Sections 5 and 11 of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act had been proven. It emphasized the clear and convincing evidence of the drug buy-bust procedure and the legitimacy of the search that followed.

Chain of Custody Compliance

The court highlighted the importance of the chain

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.