Title
People vs. De Castro y Santos
Case
G.R. No. 243386
Decision Date
Sep 2, 2019
De Castro acquitted as prosecution failed to prove compliance with chain of custody rules under RA 9165, compromising drug evidence integrity.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 243386)

Facts of the Case

Two separate informations were filed against De Castro: Criminal Case No. 10-501 for illegal possession of dangerous drugs, and Criminal Case No. 10-502 for illegal sale of dangerous drugs. Both incidents occurred on August 4, 2010, in Muntinlupa City, where De Castro was apprehended in possession of a total of 0.14 grams of Methylamphetamine Hydrochloride, known as shabu, contained in multiple plastic sachets.

Prosecution's Version

The prosecution's case relied on multiple witnesses, including police officers and forensic chemists who participated in a buy-bust operation. The operation was purportedly initiated after receiving information about De Castro's illegal drug activities. During the operation, De Castro allegedly sold shabu to a poseur-buyer and was found in possession of additional drugs when apprehended. Despite procedural documentation being in place, the prosecution had to navigate the sensitivities of law enforcement conduct during such operations.

Defense's Version

De Castro, as the sole witness for his defense, claimed he was wrongfully arrested. He asserted that his apprehension occurred on August 3, 2010, and that he was searched without cause by police officers who failed to find any illegal substances initially. This version aimed to undermine the prosecution's narrative by arguing against the timeline of events and the legality of the evidence against him.

Ruling of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)

The RTC found De Castro guilty, ruling that the prosecution had successfully established all elements of the charges against him. It pointed out that the buy-bust operation was conducted in accordance with legal standards, although procedural requirements related to evidence handling were acknowledged.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals (CA)

The CA affirmed the RTC's ruling, stating that all elements of the charges were proven beyond a reasonable doubt. However, it noted procedural deficiencies regarding compliance with evidence handling laws, particularly the requirements set forth under Section 21 of RA 9165.

Issue at Stake

The central issue involved whether De Castro's guilt for violation of Sections 5 and 11 of RA 9165 was proven beyond reasonable doubt, particularly given the procedural lapses noted during the law enforcement process.

The Court's Ruling

Upon appeal, the Court granted De Castro's acquittal, emphasizing the critical nature of maintaining the integrity and identity of the corpus delicti in drug-related offenses. The

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.