Title
People vs. De Asis y Balquin
Case
G.R. No. 225219
Decision Date
Jun 11, 2018
Appellant convicted for illegal sale and possession of shabu; chain of custody upheld, penalties affirmed by Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 225219)

Charges Against the Accused

Rico de Asis y Balquin faced multiple charges related to illegal drug activities, specifically:

  1. Illegal Sale of Dangerous Drugs: Under Section 5, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165.
  2. Illegal Possession of Dangerous Drugs: Under Section 11, Article II of the same act, involving four sachets of methamphetamine hydrochloride or "shabu".
  3. Possession of Drug Paraphernalia: Under Section 12, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165, which includes items used for consuming dangerous drugs.

Arrest and Prosecution's Version

The prosecution's account details a buy-bust operation conducted on June 1, 2011, after receiving information from a civilian informant. Agent Gacus, posing as a buyer, purchased shabu from Balquin. Upon executing the operation, the team arrested Balquin after he sold the drug in exchange for marked money. The subsequent search of Balquin's residence uncovered several sachets of shabu and drug paraphernalia, corroborating the illegal activities.

Defense's Version

In his defense, Balquin asserted that PDEA agents entered his home without a warrant and claimed he had been coerced into confessing knowledge of the drugs. He alleged that the drugs and money were planted after the agents assaulted him. The defense contended that the prosecution had failed to establish the credibility of its operations and the integrity of the evidence presented.

Ruling of the Regional Trial Court

On April 15, 2014, the Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicted Balquin of illegal sale and possession of dangerous drugs but acquitted him of the charge related to drug paraphernalia due to lack of evidence showing his possession of such items. The RTC underscored the prosecution's ability to demonstrate the elements of both crimes beyond a reasonable doubt—specifically, identifying the seller, the buyer, and the illegal substance sold—while addressing the compliance with the chain of custody required in drug-related cases.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision on April 21, 2016, with modifications to the penalties imposed. It upheld the findings of guilt for illegal sale and possession of dangerous drugs, concluding that the appellate record indicated full compliance with the legal requirements for the chain of custody of drug evidence

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.