Title
People vs. Dasig
Case
G.R. No. 100231
Decision Date
Apr 28, 1993
A police officer was killed by NPA members; the accused's voluntary confession was upheld, but the crime was reclassified as Simple Rebellion, resulting in an 8-year sentence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 102300)

Chronology of Events and Charging

On August 4, 1987, eight armed men approached and fatally shot Pfc. Redempto Manatad while on traffic duty, employing treachery, premeditation, superior strength and a vehicle to effect escape. Patrolman Catamora, acting as backup, engaged one faction, heard shots at Manatad, fled for safety and witnessed the group fire additional rounds into the fallen officer. The assailants then commandeered a vehicle and fled. An Information in the Regional Trial Court of Mandaue City charged Dasig, Nunez and others with murder with direct assault against a person in authority.

Custodial Interrogation and Extra-Judicial Confession

On August 16, 1987, police teams located Dasig and Nunez at a suspected sparrow unit safehouse. Nunez was arrested with a .45 revolver; Dasig was shot in the arm, apprehended and hospitalized. On August 19, M/Sgt. Ira interrogated Dasig at the hospital after advising him of his rights under the 1987 Constitution and securing Atty. Fortunato Parawan’s assistance at Dasig’s request. The interrogation, conducted in Cebuano, culminated in a written, sworn confession (Exhibit J) in which Dasig admitted membership in the New People’s Army’s sparrow unit and participation in Manatad’s killing.

Legal Arguments on Confession Admissibility

Appellant argued that his extra-judicial confession was inadmissible because (1) he was too ill to comprehend his rights; (2) counsel did not actively advise him; and (3) counsel’s presence merely lent an appearance of legality. He asserted that the procedure violated his constitutional right to a competent, independent lawyer and to remain silent.

Court’s Analysis on Voluntariness and Counsel

Both the trial court and Supreme Court found that (a) Dasig was properly informed of his rights; (b) he affirmatively accepted Atty. Parawan as counsel of his own choice; (c) the confession was made voluntarily, without threats or promise of leniency; (d) the written statement was read to him in a language he understood; and (e) the affidavit was subscribed and sworn before Asst. City Fiscal Solima, who certified its voluntary nature. Relying on Section 12(1), Article III of the 1987 Constitution and People v. Parojinog, the Court held that mere presence of counsel, coupled with counsel’s testimony of active assistance throughout the interrogation, satisfied the requirement of independent legal aid.

Classification of Offense: Murder vs. Rebellion

Although charged with murder with direct assault, the Supreme Court recognized that Dasig’s admitted role as a member of the NPA’s sparrow unit rendered the killing an act in furtherance of rebellion under Arts. 134–135, Rev

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.